Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne

He did not start railing on McCain until shortly before SC. Then he scrambled to endorse Fred, then Mitt. He should have been educating the masses about Hunter’s record for months.


50 posted on 02/07/2008 3:37:34 PM PST by pissant (Time for a CONSERVATIVE party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: pissant

If Rush couldn’t move folks away from McCain, why do you think he could have moved them to Hunter?

How many months should Rush have been pounding on people’s heads who should have known better in the first place?

If folks had been listening to Rush for more than a month, they should have known that McCain wasn’t acceptable.


57 posted on 02/07/2008 3:45:49 PM PST by DoughtyOne (That's right John McStain, you'll get my vote when you peel it from my cold dead fingers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
He did not start railing on McCain until shortly before SC. Then he scrambled to endorse Fred, then Mitt. He should have been educating the masses about Hunter’s record for months.

Funny, I never heard Rush claim to be responsible for how people vote. I think it's up to each voter to educate himself, not hang on Rush's words to tell them what to think or do.>/p>

Rush had plenty good to say about Hunter. Nobody was buying. If he'd spent months on Hunter's record he would have sounded like a nutcase and lost his whole audience except for the 37 people who already were going to vote for Hunter.

106 posted on 02/07/2008 4:25:58 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson