If it is McCain v. Clinton, do you let Clinton teach the country a lesson about liberalism, or do you pick McCain?? With Clinton as Pres for four years, there would be a conservative in the White House in 2012.
No. There’d be a Clinton in the whitehouse until 2016. And probably an Obama in the whitehouse thereafter.
I am so there.
So,
1. We have the she-witch Marxist who’ll kill, say or do anything to get elected, ruthless mafia lesbian, supposed wife to an ex-Prez that likes to shake his finger at the general populous and sell off whatever valuables the US has to China or the highest bidder. Known for her temper, she has illegal FBI files, illegal Whitewater files, illegal whatever to blackmail whomever she chooses to focus on at the moment. But she actually spends a few dollars of her own ill-gotten money on her own campaign. Maybe some of the White House antiques or china she stole as the 1st “Lady” (used sarcastically here) were sold for this purposes. Or maybe this is what Ron Paul/Stan Lee Media’s money was grabbed for, or Hsu, or the Chinese, or the Birthday Party, or take your pick.
2. We have the 1/2 black 1/2 white candidate who came to power through an Illinois election that ran off a Republican candidate because his wife didn’t like going to a club in Paris with him, although she now lives in France, is married to a chef, and now has a little girl. Backed with Soros money, the man went to a madrassa as a child, grew up in Hawaii, and is 1st cousin to the moslem opposition leader in Kenya whose group is causing all the bloodshed there now; the man retains no influence from his madrassa days, is a member of a racist church, has received support from blacks and old school politicians, has made earlier comments about how evil whites are, and has left unvoted bills which would demonstrate his position to the public. The man is noted to be hard left, perhaps communist, but definitely socialist/marxist.
Then we have a teetering older candidate with a legendary temper, whose claim to fame is as a military hostage over 35 years ago. This man worked to foil conservative judgeships, legislate an anything goes campaign financing law, ammesty law, pro-choice, etc....and came back from NOWHERE-having lost financial support and campaign staff to rival campaigns. Claiming membership to an alternative to lockstep marxism, the man says conservative evangelicals are foul, but wants to have them work with/come to him.
Then there’s a tagalong conservative former governor, whose votes for delegates trail at the back of the pack, no matter his politics.
We are so F*!@?d