To: Sam's Army
I just wonder if voting 3rd party (as tempting as that sounds), would do the same for Clinton 2 that Perot did for Clinton 1?
264 posted on
02/07/2008 9:46:10 AM PST by
Lucky9teen
(It's as if the menu's been whittled down to tripe or mountain oysters.)
To: Lucky9teen
"I just wonder if voting 3rd party (as tempting as that sounds), would do the same for Clinton 2 that Perot did for Clinton 1?"
It may. But if the choice is basically between a liberal and another liberal, that's the main difference between 1992 and now.
To: Lucky9teen
I just wonder if voting 3rd party (as tempting as that sounds), would do the same for Clinton 2 that Perot did for Clinton 1Not worth taking the chance, but yet, Hillary is not Bill and is very much disliked even by Democrats. If the fight for the Dem nomination also serves to tick off one of their major voting blocks (African Americans) one has to wonder if the perfect third party storm is brewing.
491 posted on
02/07/2008 10:31:59 AM PST by
Mygirlsmom
(Clowns to the left of me, fakers to the right-here I am-what's a Right Winger to do?)
To: Lucky9teen
719 posted on
02/07/2008 12:14:19 PM PST by
beckysueb
(Pray for our troops , America, and President Bush)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson