Romney was not the spoiler in California.
Huckabee was a distant 3rd, sometimes falling behind Giuliani.
The west doesn’t like Huckabee, and the south doesn’t like Romney.
,,, Huckabee was a distant 3rd, sometimes falling behind Giuliani. The west doesn’t like Huckabee, and the south doesn’t like Romney
'sactly...
"the south doesn’t like Romney"
the Huckster's support was all from southern evangelical states - no chance of anti-Mormon votes there. No "surprise, surprise" 
I have gone over and over the states each candidate won. Karl Rove did mention the states Obamha won are most likely not be in his column if he is the nominee.
After checking each candidate and the states each won,I believe Clinton and Romney are most likely to carry the states they won, But Obamha and McCain will not carry most of the states they won. Do any of you believe McCain will win NY, NJ.Ill, Or Cal? That is where most of his delegates came from.
By the same token I can see Huckabee winning the states he carried. McCain can win the blue states in the primaries but it it almost impossible to think he can win them in a general election.
Just thinking,what a choice!!!!!
“Romney was not the spoiler in California.
Huckabee was a distant 3rd, sometimes falling behind Giuliani.
The west doesn’t like Huckabee, and the south doesn’t like Romney.”
But Romney did better *in* the south, than Huckabee did *outside* the south.
And Romney racked up much more votes total than Huckster.
Huckster needs to get out of the race. He’s the 3rd wheel on a bicycle.