Posted on 02/05/2008 5:27:09 PM PST by SE Mom
Edited on 02/05/2008 6:07:59 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
The conservative outrage after Meirs got us one of those.
The nation’s leading abortion advocate, NARAL Pro-Choice America, criticized Romney, writing: “[A]s governor he initially expressed pro-choice beliefs but had a generally anti-choice record. His position on choice has changed. His position is now anti-choice.”
This is a quote. If NARAL is his enemy what does that tell you about his stance on abortion?
i agree with you, however, as tolerant as i am, i DO NOT want a muslim in the white house. (ie obama)
so if that makes me a bigot then i will proudly where the banner
If truth be told, Huck really didn’t win WV, Romney did.
I agree with you. Bush did get a firecracker thrown into his lap but he still performed poorly as a conservative. Working with the Swimmer on the NCLB act and the labeling of the minutemen as “vigilantes” were the final straws for me. I don’t think he’s a bad man but he’s not a principled conservative.
I keep on saying that! That is the problem. None of the three contending RINOs inspire. We’re screwed!
Absentee going Hillary! and McCain, in-person going Obama and Romney.
Is the absentee voting indicative of ballot-stuffing fraud to be so starkly contrasted to in-person voting?
-PJ
Karl, Great job, I’m trying to get as much info as I can in CA Thanks
btd
The Democrats have an advantage of at least 2:1 in turnout!
We’re hosed...
***Scariest post of the thread.
Let’s try reading comprehension 101, shall we:
Poster wrote :“Mitt bragging on CNN about how the three places he has lived have all voted for him...UT, MI, and MA.”
Which implies Romney cannot win anywhere else...
I respond thus: “And the other 47 places he has not lived are telling him to go climb a tree?”
Notice the ‘question mark’ at the end of my response?
That means I did not agree with the poster... capeesh?
Exactly right..:)
California
Mike Huckabee (Rep) 30,745 11.5 %
Duncan Hunter (Rep) 1,055 0.3 %
Alan Keyes (Rep) 1,075 0.5 %
Sam Brownback (Rep) 170 0.0 %
John H. Cox (Rep) 269 0.1 %
Rudy Giuliani (Rep) 26,174 9.8 %
John McCain (Rep) 114,323 42.7 %
Ron Paul (Rep) 10,931 4.1 %
Mitt Romney (Rep) 72,161 27.0 %
Tom Tancredo (Rep) 514 0.1 %
Fred Thompson (Rep) 10,331 3.9 %
You can do anything you want. If you bring it up on a public forum, you come across as a bigot.
California 6% reporting
Mccain 44%
Romney 25%
but “still too close to call”.
I thought you posted that you wouldn’t use the Lord to engage in sophistry.
Matthew CH19
23 And Jesus said to His disciples, “Truly I say to you, it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. 24 “Again I say to you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.” 25 When the disciples heard this, they were very astonished and said, “Then who can be saved?” 26 And looking at them Jesus said to them, “With people this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.”
Romney already 100,000 votes behind in CA.
I know, I was just posting a general comment.
reminds me of people who say masons can’t be christians or other such not as “godly as i”
(that whole pharasee vs the tax collector parable)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.