Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Great Victory for pro Life and Liberty Conservatives!
Feb 5, 2008 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 02/05/2008 1:50:13 PM PST by Jim Robinson

Edited on 02/05/2008 2:11:57 PM PST by Jim Robinson. [history]

The good news about this primary season is the pro abortion rights, pro gay rights, pro illegal alien rights, anti gun rights Rudy Giuliani was soundly rejected by the Republican primary voters!

Hurrah!

As Rudy was being actively promoted by the mass media and the liberal/moderate wing of the Republican party and for many months was billed as the so-called GOP "front runner," this was a great victory for the pro life and liberty conservative wing of the party!

Hurrah!

At least the previously {cough} pro abortion former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney was politically astute enough to realize that a pro abortion candidate cannot win the Republican nomination, so, wisely, some say cunningly, adjusted his core bedrock principles accordingly.

Thank God!

Vote as if your life depends upon it!

It does.

Vote to secure the Blessings of Life and Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity!


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: elections; prolife; supertuesday
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121 next last
To: Jim Robinson

Now thar’s some shaky stools!

I wouldn’t want to milk ol’ Bossie sittin’ on one of those!


61 posted on 02/05/2008 2:47:53 PM PST by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: redinIllinois
They were both governors, but those people give Romney a pass for not being able to do what he “really” wanted, because he had a Democrat legislature to work with, when Huckabee was able to work successfully with his Democrat legislature.

Yes, he did. To get in-state tuition for illegals and set up a little Mexico in Arkansas.
62 posted on 02/05/2008 2:48:02 PM PST by CottonBall (The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation. (Henry David Thoreau, "Walden", 1854 ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: redinIllinois

Newt is one of the establishment Republicans. He’s pro-amnesty. Of course, he’ll back McHuckabee.


63 posted on 02/05/2008 2:49:19 PM PST by CottonBall (The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation. (Henry David Thoreau, "Walden", 1854 ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

If the GOP nominates a pro-amnesty candidate, they are setting the stage for their eventual downfall, which will inevitably drag the pro-life cause along with it.


64 posted on 02/05/2008 2:52:20 PM PST by Notary Sojac (No clothespin, no compromise, no McCain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Thanks for voting your conscience.


65 posted on 02/05/2008 2:54:04 PM PST by Theophilus (Nothing can make Americans safer than to stop aborting them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Oh man, you guys need to stop this anti-McCain stuff. Let’s be rational and realize that Senator McCain is running as a conservative.


66 posted on 02/05/2008 2:57:06 PM PST by No Dems 2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
>>>>>Romney was my final answer.

Romney is no better than Giuliani.

67 posted on 02/05/2008 3:00:25 PM PST by Reagan Man (Say no to McCain, say no to Romney, say no to Huckabee. Write in Fred Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
A deadlocked national convention will not result in a white knight riding in to save the day. It will be a backroom deal resulting in McCain grabbing the crown and placing it upon his head.

He will move the party to the left to keep the respect of “his good friends”. Although he has voted pro-life, it is not an issue he has any great passion for or commitment to. John McCain has neither the temperament nor the deep loyalty to conservative principles to be a good president.

68 posted on 02/05/2008 3:01:43 PM PST by keepitreal ( John McCain: Foot soldier of the Reagan Revolution who went AWOL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

Well said.


69 posted on 02/05/2008 3:04:02 PM PST by WayneM (Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
.. we can draft a true conservative.

That's a nice dream.

But in reality, if there WAS one who wanted to be President, he (or she) would already have let be known.

Even if there is a possible candidate, that person would never generate enough support, or money, between Sept.1 and Nov. 5 to stand a snowball's chance against the well-funded, head-of-steam Democrat whether bomb-o brack-a or Hilary.

The entire GOP would be so demoralized over a 'forced' convention candidate that the GOP would get smeared.

Romney is the candidate who promotes conservatism. Romney is the candidate who can best build the wall, generate economic stimulus, and identify conservative Judges for SCOTUS.

70 posted on 02/05/2008 3:05:13 PM PST by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Rock&RollRepublican

No, it’s a prayer.

You don’t want to know my opinion of Romney.


71 posted on 02/05/2008 3:19:01 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: jerry557; Jim Robinson
Abortion should be a non-issue in presidential politics. The White House can’t do anything about abortion...Sure he can appoint judges, but with a Democrat congress? They will never allow a judge to be confirmed that support abolishing Roe vs Wade. [jerry557]

Jerry, you're sadly mistaken.

President Reagan implemented the Mexico City policy, and George W. reinstated it in 2001 (after Clinton rescinded it) that kept $ going into the international abortion industry coffers. Then in the early 80s, Reagan came out with a book, Abortion: The Conscience of a Nation...showing an American president could use his bully pulpit to favor life in the womb!

You can elect the most anti-abortion, pro-life candidate in the nation and he is powerless to do anything.

I wouldn't call the Mexico City policy implementations "powerless." I wouldn't call a POTUS hitting up some of the funding of the domestic side of the abortion industry powerless, either--something within the reach of a POTUS. Also, a pro-life POTUS even working with a Democratic Congress can keep radical pro-abort justices off of the Supreme Court.

72 posted on 02/05/2008 3:25:55 PM PST by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jerry557; wagglebee; Pinkbell; EternalVigilance; Salvation; Kevmo; Antoninus

“Abortion should be a non-issue in presidential politics.”

The purpose of government is to ensure our rights, chief of which is the “unalienable” right to life.

The 5th amendment’s Due Process clause and the 14th amendment’s Due Process and Equal Protection clauses REQUIRE the federal and state governments to protect innocent human life.

Abortion, and defending innocent human life, are presidential “issues.”

The president can do more than promote a human life amendment. He can advocate for, and sign, the Right to Life Amendment. It is his duty.


73 posted on 02/05/2008 3:27:44 PM PST by fetal heart beats by 21st day (Defending human life is not a federalist issue. It is the business of all of humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jerry557
Abortion should be a non-issue in presidential politics. The White House can’t do anything about abortion. You can elect the most anti-abortion, pro-life candidate in the nation and he is powerless to do anything. Sure he can appoint judges, but with a Democrat congress? They will never allow a judge to be confirmed that support abolishing Roe vs Wade.
But then, the president can simply leave the position vacant - which would leave the libs in a position to be able to get a tie, at best, when Kennedy votes with them. Which would leave the lower court's ruling in place, so worst case the libs only win half the time that Kennedy goes with them. And since abortion actually cuts electorally in favor of conservatives, it should be possible to make electoral hay out of it.

Problem is, of course, that McCain is out for McCain and not for the Republican Party.

But it's moot since there won't be a McCain Administration. Either on the day of his nomination, or in October at the latest, Big Journalism will suddenly notice that McCain is old, ugly, Keating-5 corrupt, and ill-tempered. And we'll look back fondly on 1996 when we had a candidate who had a chance . . .


74 posted on 02/05/2008 3:27:57 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (The Democratic Party is only a front for the political establishment in America - Big Journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Mike Huckabee and John McCain are just what this country needs! Pro-amnesty, anti-Gitmo, pro-tax, pro-campaign finance reform, anti-conservative SC judges, anti-ANWR, anti-energy independence! What a platform!

... all for what? A single issue, which Mitt Romney has made a switch on, but does represent the conservative view.

This wasn’t a victory for liberty or life. This was a victory for the simple-minded and single issue voters and it won’t be a victory for any of us in November.


75 posted on 02/05/2008 3:30:45 PM PST by ERJCaptain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

In your opinion.


76 posted on 02/05/2008 3:37:35 PM PST by listenhillary ("Oh, they'll rally behind me" Sneered John McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Romney is winning in http://thesaurus.reference.com/browse/expediency


77 posted on 02/05/2008 3:44:34 PM PST by Tigen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ERJCaptain
Yeah, well, Romney isn't any better. Yeah, I know. He's converted and is no longer an abortionist/gay rights activist. Is he still pushing his failing socialist RomneyCare ® big government boondoggle?

Romney's legacy: Subsidized, mandated, tyrannical RomneyCare ® with its Planned Parenthood $50 co-pay abortions, gay marriage, liberal judges.

But it's NOT his fault. The liberals made him do it. ®

78 posted on 02/05/2008 3:47:31 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Huckster’s legacy is liable to be a McCain nomination and a Democrat in the White House.


79 posted on 02/05/2008 3:55:42 PM PST by shempy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: shempy

I’d say that’s the late GOP’s legacy. Just keep pushing those RINOs.


80 posted on 02/05/2008 3:57:55 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson