Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RussP

Oh, I have no problem with using farmland to produce either methanol or ethanol. If that is the surest method of de-funding the Middle East I’m all for it.

I’m just pointing out that trying to create a distinction between crops that are “foodstuffs” and crops that aren’t is disingenuous. It all has to be grown on some amount of land by farmers that otherwise would be growing something else. Besides, ethanol can be produced from non-food crops just as surely as it can be produced from corn; weather the particular crop used to produce biofuel is edible or not has no real meaning.


55 posted on 02/03/2008 8:39:22 PM PST by eclecticEel (oh well, Hunter 2012 anyone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: eclecticEel

“Besides, ethanol can be produced from non-food crops just as surely as it can be produced from corn”

I don’t have the info handy but I know I read that ethanol requires plants high in starch or sugars in order to be efficiently produced. Not methanol.


62 posted on 02/03/2008 8:49:35 PM PST by Delacon (Don't Immanentize the Eschaton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: eclecticEel
. It all has to be grown on some amount of land by farmers that otherwise would be growing something else.

Would seaweed and kelp work? Water lilies work great to suck up sewage and grow like crazy in such an environment. Can we dredge those up?

89 posted on 02/04/2008 7:53:44 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson