Skip to comments.
Super Trailer to Ben Stein's new movie, "Expelled - No Intelligence Allowed"
Premise Media Corporation ^
| In Theaters Spring 2008
| Kevin Miller, Walt Ruloff, John Sullivan, Nathan Frankowski
Posted on 02/03/2008 12:58:53 PM PST by KayEyeDoubleDee
...For most of my life, I believed the answers to these questions were fairly straightforward. Everything that exists is created by a Loving God. That includes rocks, trees, animals, people, really everything. All along I had been well aware that other people, very smart people, believe otherwise. Rather than God's handiwork, they see the universe as the product of random particle collisions and chemical reactions. And rather than regard humankind as carrying the spark of the divine, they believe we are nothing more than mud animated by lightning...
Trailer requires Shockwave Flash:
Super Trailer
http://www.expelledthemovie.com/playgroundvideo3.swf
More trailers here: http://www.expelledthemovie.com/video.php
IMDB page: Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1091617/
![](http://i242.photobucket.com/albums/ff288/kayeyedoubledee/ben_stein_expelled_LARGE_CROPPED.jpg)
(Excerpt) Read more at expelledthemovie.com ...
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: benstein; crevo; expelled; moviereview
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-314 next last
To: KayEyeDoubleDee
Along with Al Gores little flick, perhaps it should have a “PP” rating (pure propaganda).
2
posted on
02/03/2008 1:04:03 PM PST
by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: KayEyeDoubleDee
I’m looking forward to this movie!
3
posted on
02/03/2008 1:04:05 PM PST
by
TenthAmendmentChampion
(Global warming is to Revelations as the theory of evolution is to Genesis.)
To: KayEyeDoubleDee
wow...nice trailer. You go Ben!
4
posted on
02/03/2008 1:07:56 PM PST
by
Drango
(A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
To: Coyoteman
You don’t think our schools are dumbed-down factories run by “liberals” who will allow no beliefs but their own?
5
posted on
02/03/2008 1:08:47 PM PST
by
JennysCool
(They all say they want change, but they’re really after folding money.)
To: JennysCool
You dont think our schools are dumbed-down factories run by liberals who will allow no beliefs but their own? I don't think intelligent design is science.
It is religious belief trying to sneak back into the schools after creation "science" was banned by the Supreme Court's Edwards decision in the late 1980s. See the Wedge Strategy for details.
6
posted on
02/03/2008 1:13:24 PM PST
by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: KayEyeDoubleDee
No intelligence allowed. Because if you had some intelligence you would realize how full of it Ben Stein the Al Frankin supporter is.
7
posted on
02/03/2008 1:15:23 PM PST
by
allmendream
("A Lyger is pretty much my favorite animal."NapoleonD (nocrybabyconservatives))
To: Coyoteman
Learn from Thomas Jefferson, get a thick skin.
But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.
-Thomas Jefferson, Notes on Virginia, 1782
8
posted on
02/03/2008 1:19:07 PM PST
by
MadLibDisease
(The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools.)
To: Coyoteman
So you think that Stein’s film is propaganda?
9
posted on
02/03/2008 1:20:17 PM PST
by
TheBattman
(LORD God, please give us a Christian Patriot with a backbone for President in 08, Amen.)
To: KayEyeDoubleDee
To: KayEyeDoubleDee
Talk about no intelligence allowed, how can you explain Ben’s contributions to Al Franken’s senate campaign. It’s pure loyalty to a friend not loyalty to party or principles.
To: Coyoteman
Why is it when we convey our beliefs, or findings, it is called “Pure Prepaganda”?
12
posted on
02/03/2008 1:22:03 PM PST
by
Airwinger
(Semper Fi,)
To: Coyoteman
We will hear from you further on this matter, Mr. Stein.
13
posted on
02/03/2008 1:22:13 PM PST
by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(The Democratic Party is only a front for the political establishment in America - Big Journalism.)
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: KayEyeDoubleDee
What does an intelligent design theorist teach? How do you test the theory?
15
posted on
02/03/2008 1:25:51 PM PST
by
Perchant
To: DaveLoneRanger
16
posted on
02/03/2008 1:26:15 PM PST
by
TenthAmendmentChampion
(Global warming is to Revelations as the theory of evolution is to Genesis.)
To: Airwinger
Findings? What findings. Creation Scientists don’t do science, they critique science using apologetics. Please provide sources to these ‘findings’.
And Ben Stein is putting out propaganda. I read his intro to the movie. It has more straw-men than the Wizard of Oz. It conflates evolution with atheism, when the majority of Scientists in the U.S.A. are Christian (as am I, both a Scientist and a Christian). It is an advocacy piece that doesn’t accurately portray what it opposes; this is propaganda.
17
posted on
02/03/2008 1:28:48 PM PST
by
allmendream
("A Lyger is pretty much my favorite animal."NapoleonD (nocrybabyconservatives))
To: KayEyeDoubleDee
I used to like Ben Stein. How could he support Al Franken? I've met Al; he's a moron in person too. Another Napoleon type like McCain.
18
posted on
02/03/2008 1:31:28 PM PST
by
Yaelle
To: Airwinger
Why is it when we convey our beliefs, or findings, it is called Pure Prepaganda? Beliefs have no role in science. Science works from the scientific method.
If you have evidence, present it. The Dover case was a perfect place to highlight evidence for ID. Behe in fact was looking forward to getting "evos" on the witness stand (he talked of a "vice"). But when the dust settled it was Behe who came off looking foolish--he couldn't produce any credible evidence for ID and the case was lost.
19
posted on
02/03/2008 1:31:45 PM PST
by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: Perchant
Why should they have to? Evolutionists can’t test their theory - it happens over millions of years. Can’t put that in a lab and get repeatable observable experiments.
ANd don’t give me the crap experiments of fruit flies. All that proves is that doses of radiation produces damaged, genetically inferior fruit flies. You get me an experiment where you get a non-fly from a fly, and can repeat it, then I will believe in one species coming from another. But radiation is not going to get you there.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-314 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson