Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Chalk up another one for Willard the Wonder Boy.
1 posted on 02/01/2008 7:06:43 PM PST by RTO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: RTO

this from the NEA website...tolerance can and should be taught without assailing religion LOL...

Teaching Tolerance or Attacking Religion?
How far can schools go in teaching tolerance for gays and lesbians? Two federal courts tackle this thorny question.
It’s the latest battleground in the culture wars. In the wake of several high-profile cases holding school districts liable for failing to protect gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgendered (GLBT) students from peer harassment, many schools have adopted training programs intended to reduce harassment and promote acceptance of GLBT students.

Some parents find these programs objectionable because they conflict with their deeply held religious belief that homosexuality is sinful, and they don’t want the schools to undermine their parental authority by teaching a contrary lesson.

Federal courts in Maryland and Kentucky recently struggled to resolve this conflict, with differing results.

In a dispute that is still ongoing, the Montgomery County (Maryland) Board of Education last year adopted a health education curriculum designed to teach tolerance of gays and lesbians. Among other things, course materials described as a “myth” the belief that “homosexuality is a sin” and characterized certain Christian religions as “intolerant and Biblically misguided” because they are “opposed to homosexuality.”

In a lawsuit filed in May 2005 by two groups of parents and citizens, a federal district court issued an injunction prohibiting the Maryland school district from implementing the curriculum. The court found that the course materials violate the Constitution by attacking the views of certain religions, while promoting the views of other religions that “are more friendly towards the homosexual lifestyle.”

The school district has agreed to revise the controversial curriculum. That process is still underway.

In the Kentucky case decided in February, a federal district court ruled that parents don’t have the right to have their children opt out of mandatory “student diversity training” designed to stop the harassment of GLBT students.

The program adopted by the Board of Education of Boyd County, Kentucky, consists of a one-hour video, followed by comments from an instructor and questions from students. Students who refuse to attend receive an unexcused absence.

The school district agreed to implement the mandatory training for both staff and students as part of the settlement of a 2003 lawsuit filed by GLBT students charging that the district had turned a blind eye to peer harassment and had illegally denied official recognition to a Gay Straight Alliance student club.

The parents had claimed that the training violated their right to practice their religion because the diversity training “promoted values contrary to their religious beliefs” and “attempted to change [their children’s] religious and ideological views regarding homosexuality.”

The court disagreed. Merely exposing students to “views [that are] contrary to their religious beliefs” does not infringe on their religious freedom, the court said. Plus, there was no evidence that any student “was compelled to disavow his or her religious beliefs” or to “endorse homosexuality.”

The court also ruled that the program did not violate the plaintiffs’ “parental rights” to direct the upbringing and religious training of their children. Parents, the court held, have no “fundamental right to dictate curriculum,” even where they may have “genuine moral disagreements with the school’s choice of subject matter.”

Of special note, the court rejected the parents’ reliance on the Maryland decision to challenge the Boyd County program. The Boyd County program, the court said, “is a far cry” from the curriculum struck down in Maryland, which denigrated several religions and attempted to “elevate certain religious views over others.”

The lesson from these two cases is simple: One way school districts can fulfill their legal obligation to provide a safe learning environment for GLBT students is to mandate anti-harassment training. And these lessons of tolerance can and should be taught without assailing religion.

As the judge in the Maryland case cautioned: School officials can “achieve the goals of advocating tolerance and providing health-related information” without teaching “such controversial topics as whether homosexuality is a sin, whether AIDS is God’s judgment on homosexuals, and whether churches that condemn homosexuality are on theologically solid ground.”


61 posted on 02/01/2008 7:48:55 PM PST by hercuroc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DaveLoneRanger; 2Jedismom; aberaussie; Aggie Mama; agrace; Antoninus; arbooz; bboop; bill1952; ...

ANOTHER REASON TO HOMESCHOOL

This ping list is for the “other” articles of interest to homeschoolers about education and public school. If you want on/off this list, please freepmail me. The main Homeschool Ping List by DaveLoneRanger handles the homeschool-specific articles. This is becoming a fairly high volume list.
72 posted on 02/01/2008 7:59:46 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RTO

I think it’s time for all Conservative parents to pull their children out of the public schools. Seriously. Do whatever you can, but get them out of there. Either homeschool them, or put them in private or parochial schools. But get them out now. We could make it a goal. No more Conservative children in the public schools. I’d even be willing to start or contribute to a fund for that purpose. No child left behind? Make that: No child left in public school. THAT should be the goal.


83 posted on 02/01/2008 8:33:06 PM PST by my_pointy_head_is_sharp (Vote for whoever will keep Hill & Bill out of the White House. Don't let them desecrate it again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RTO

This judge is obviously pro-pervert. This is what happens when you cede the state substantial control over kids, instead of the family.


97 posted on 02/01/2008 9:22:05 PM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RTO

Parents should band together to keep their kids out until the state comes to its senses.

If it were my kid, they would be in a private school immediately. Otherwise home schooling, otherwise a coop home schooling plan.


107 posted on 02/01/2008 10:10:52 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Wanted: Party, f/t, cons, refs g/b 20yrs, no RINOs, no amnesty sptrs, 1 vote per 4 yrs negotiable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RTO
THE OVERHAULING OF STRAIGHT AMERICA
109 posted on 02/01/2008 10:14:10 PM PST by DakotaRed (Keep following the media as they sell out America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RTO

why, the children I know, laughed at the idea of being gay.


111 posted on 02/01/2008 10:17:42 PM PST by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RTO

>> that a school can expose children to contrary ideas without violating their parents’ rights

This is really, really poor judgment.


115 posted on 02/01/2008 10:43:47 PM PST by Gene Eric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RTO; All
To begin with, Romans 1:25-27 tells us that same-sex sexual relationships are a consequence of idolatry. In other words, such relationships are a consequence of disobeying the 1ST COMMANDMENT, a major aspect of the GREATEST COMMANDMENT, to love God with all your being.

Homosexuals need to keep in mind, however, that the good news of the gospel is not about how God despises same-sex sexual relationships. In fact, 1 Corinthians 6:9-11 indicates that certain members of that church had been slaves to such relationships but had been cleansed in Jesus' name. So these former homosexuals had evidently repented and accepted God's grace to straighten their lives out.

John 3:16
Revelation 3:20

Also, consider how judges are now reflecting the evil of the Pharisees of Jesus' time. More specifically, consider how Mark 7:1-13, particularly verses 10-12, shows that Jesus reprimanded the Pharisees for essentially driving a wedge between parents and their children as our judges are now doing, basically nullifying the 5TH COMMANDMENT, to honor your parents.

Finally, regarding Christian taxpayers who are unwillingly helping to pay for public schools to expose their children to homosexuality, Jefferson addressed this situation in general when he wrote his Bill for Religious Freedom as evidenced by the following excerpt.

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical." --Thomas Jefferson: Bill for Religious Freedom, 1779. Papers 2:545 http://www.religioustolerance.org/virg_bil.htm
As a side note, I also won't overlook the fact that Christian taxpayers have been unwillingly helping to pay for public schools teach scientifically unverified macroevolution ideas for the past several decades, such ideas actually being a politically correct attack on Christianity.
116 posted on 02/01/2008 10:47:40 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RTO

"Did you hear that, lover? Free at last!"

/barf

121 posted on 02/02/2008 4:40:43 AM PST by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RTO; SavannahJake; PaulZe; poobear; AKA Elena; Oshkalaboomboom; LikeLight; Ol' Sparky; bdeaner; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.

133 posted on 02/02/2008 6:34:11 AM PST by narses (...the spirit of Trent is abroad once more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RTO

I wonder how many judges belong to NAMBLA


134 posted on 02/02/2008 6:36:28 AM PST by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RTO
Sell the house. Go to another state with a good school and live in a community that still values family. Everyone should leave the entire state.

I don’t get this filth. Homosexuals are only 2% of the population and they act like everyone in America is gay. Sick.

148 posted on 02/02/2008 3:12:47 PM PST by SQUID
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RTO
agreed with a judge's decision last year that a school can expose children to contrary ideas without violating their parents' rights to exercise religious beliefs.

"Contrary" ideas? How about bestiality or pedophilic sex? Without legislating arbitrarily from the bench, how does a judge draw the line between "contrary ideas" and pornography?

149 posted on 02/02/2008 3:17:45 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RTO
You got that right. Mitt's advocacy of the homosexual agenda in Massachusetts ultimately has contributed to introduction of homosexual propaganda in the public schools in that state...even before he left the governor's mansion.

150 posted on 02/02/2008 3:20:35 PM PST by big'ol_freeper (REAGAN: "..party..must represent certain fundamental beliefs [not] compromised..[for] expediency")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RTO

This is another reason to home school. The system doesn’t work. It is time to dismantle it.


153 posted on 02/02/2008 9:33:50 PM PST by Maelstorm ("Christ didn’t tell us to go to the government...He told us to do it." Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RTO
"Public schools," wrote Judge Sandra L. Lynch, "are not obliged to shield individual students from ideas which potentially are religiously offensive,

Judge Sandra L. Lynch - Appointed 1995 by President Clinton

As WND reported in 2006, U.S. District Judge Mark L. Wolf dismissed the civil rights lawsuit by David and Tonia Parker of Lexington, concluding there is an obligation for public schools to teach young children to accept and endorse homosexuality.

U.S. District Judge Mark L. Wolf - Appointed 1985 by President Reagan

154 posted on 02/02/2008 9:41:55 PM PST by airborne (It's way past time for a revolution!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RTO

They should also be required to talk about the higher incidence of disease and the stink.


162 posted on 02/03/2008 6:54:46 AM PST by discipler (Listen to Glenn Beck and be very afraid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson