[piytar]

Sorry, that article is cr@p. Here’s just one example:

“1. Is your extreme negative position on McCain based predominantly on worries about your ability to continue to make a (very) comfortable living in a McCain administration?”

Apparently this author thinks gutting the First Amendment further would be no big deal, so he re-casts concern for that issue as simple - gasp - desire to make a profit. You know, CAPITALISM. How EEVVIIILLLLLL! /sarc

Typical left-wing dripe...

[Antoninus]

Apparently this author thinks gutting the First Amendment further would be no big deal, so he re-casts concern for that issue as simple - gasp - desire to make a profit. You know, CAPITALISM. How EEVVIIILLLLLL

Somehow, I think you're misreading that sentence.

Here's the question: Is it right for someone to take a position at odds with their principles just to defend their livelihood? And worse, leave this reason generally unspoken? These are exactly the kinds of tactics used by lobbyists.