Posted on 01/27/2008 9:17:33 AM PST by societygirl
Irrelevant at this point.
You don’t know how accurate you are. Dems see things IN BLACK AND WHITE, especially race. They see people as GROUPS, not individuals. I know, I was raised a Dem. They also have nothing but IRRATIONAL HATRED, as their policies. They support blacks... but hate them and laugh at them behinds their backs. I have seen them do this, much to my disgust. They don’t care about blacks, women, Hispanics, they USE them. You are seeing this in the racial bloodletting of Clinton and Obama. And, IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE. Ihope nothing violent happens, but it could, as Dems tend to favor violent solutions, but now they are turning it on themselves.
Carter was beating Reagan handily at this point in the 1980 race. We know how that turned out.
Fact is though, the entire RNC and most of the GOP is headed left, Romney looks like an late 70s - 80s democrat, and conservatives have nowhere else to go unless a line is drawn in the sand somewhere.
I suspect that it will be after the carnage in November 08.
If then.
How we got past the amnesty thing in 07 I’m not sure, but I am plenty thankful for it.
I expect to see it revisited on an ongoing basis.
Puts Mass on the table. :shakes head:
You are absolutely delusional if you believe that.
Been there lately?
I will give the benefit of the doubt and assume that was rhetorical hyperbole.
In the general, from the internals so far, Mitt may well lose Florida in the general unless he spends BIG bucks here.
Even then.
I thought it might be that, but there is a difference between working for romney and endorsing romney.
?
That Rasmussen link you posted shows national numbers. Societygirl’s post dealt with specifically Florida.
Lower Taxes 4 Raised fees more than he cut taxes
- Spending Cuts 5
- Healthcare- gov run 2 - Liberal
- Border Fence - 5 - did nothing about santuary cities in MA
- Tax Reform - 5 - did nothing net positive while governor
- SCOTUS appointments - 2 - Never met an activist, Liberal judge he could not appoint
- Pro-life - 2 - Said he was pro-life, yet pushed Planned Parenthood onto the insurance board and forced Catholics to dispense abortificant
- Education - 2 - Pushed homosexual rights in his own agenda into the schools
- Federalism - 2 - Federalism includes the 2nd Amendment.
Who is running away with it?
Who is “Mitt Romney?”
How can you tell?
No, we require far more than that. I don't want to personally challenge you, but how old are you?
Your posts read like a parody. You posted an older poll without a link and changed the headline. My first thought on viewing the thread was possible mole behavior.
Most of the Mitt supporters here are enthusiastic about the candidate, but we stay within the bounds of realism. Your headline of "Romney Running Away with It" is not realistic, and it's bad strategy at this point. So, I am thinking you are a mole.
Funny though... Many people believe Reagan also benefitted from the success of Jesse Jackson in the Democratic primaries... that scared white, southern voters to switch to Reagan ( a former union President ).
Now.. the Clintons are counting on the same force to help them. I wonder, whether it will still work. This is a different world now.. 27 years later.
PREACH IT, Sister!!
You make me proud to be a Texan.
Examine post 183, and other aspects of the thread, and tell me the poster is not a mole/troll.
Way over the top......
Nor do I.
We need someone who can stop Clinton X2.
The excitement level in the GOP is hardly containable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.