Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fweingart
Well, let's look at this rationally.

The kid has apparently been physically acting out for a while, and now he's gone into a full-blown tantrum, and he's breaking things. He needs to be restrained -- there's no question about that.

The options are three: lock him in a closet, have an adult grab him and hold him down, or restrain him some other way.

Of the three, handcuffs really do seem to be the most humane alternative.

The poor little guy undoubtedly really does have problems, and needs some help. But you can't allow him to go nuts.

162 posted on 01/25/2008 8:50:05 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: r9etb

The handcuffs are one issue.

A separate issue is that they figured he was safe enough to remove the handcuffs, but nonetheless refused to release him and insisted on taking him to the psych ward.

That’s a separate issue.

It’s funny to note that so many FReepers can be rightfully cautious about the government intrusion into gun rights...yet at the same time, trust them on other aspects. At what point do you say: “Heck, no...it’s the parents’ kid, not the government’s.”


209 posted on 01/25/2008 1:24:00 PM PST by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson