Replies

How can you get through the day with so little brain power?

Since you've got less, why don't you tell us.

Your entire "argument" is based on my saying Reagan committed a sin.

My arguement is based on this...

...we forget many of the sins perpetrated by the genuinely great Ronald Reagan...

You stated he committed may sins. What a dumb ass.

I guess you're saying Reagan never committed sins?

So far you haven't provided any evidence that he did. Even his appointment of judges is very iffy. Judges seldom turn out precisely as the appointing President thinks they will.

Now, where did I get the idea that you idolized him?

I respect Reagan a great deal and I'm proud of it.

"Lie number two. I merely pointed to things he did I consider sins, such as signing an amnesty."

Was it wrong for him to sign a bill with new laws that would have ended illegal immigration had it been enforced? Your attempt was to disparage Reagan to make it more palitable to accept what other men have done that is unacceptable. By tearing Reagan down, you hoped to humanize other people and I called you on it.

Please tell us what Reagan's sins were. We're waiting.

You don't even know what a lie is, do you?

A falsehood. You attempted to tarnish Reagan based on the immigration bill he signed granting amensty. You failed to mention that it also made provisions to end illegal immigration. The overall impact would have been very positive had the bill been enforced.

You flat out lied.

Ronald Reagan wasn't around to enforce the laws.

LOL! Oh, it's not HIS fault, he just signed an amnesty! LOL

Once again for the intellectually challenged. If you're going to address a bill, you need to address the whole bill. Reagan intended to grant amesty to all the illegals that had been in the nation for a certain period of time. That amounted to about 1 million people or 33,000 people per year, for the prior 30 years. As part of that bill, laws were enacted to end illegal immigration. You do comprehend the significance of this right? Evidently not.

If Reagan's bill which you fault him for had been enforced, it would have conservatively prevented between 35 and 50 million illegal immigrants from pouring across our borders. You have the audacity to dump on Reagan, when all these people were allowed to enter the nation after he left office. And Bush hasn't put an end to hit yet. Despite the flow of anywhere from 1.5 to 3.5 times the number of illegals that entered over 30 years, now coming in per year, you choose to dump on Reagan, not Bush, not Clinton and not the first Bush.

You are a joke. I refer anyone to your previous rambling post which foists your childish "bite me" level wit in place of reality.

You keep pointing out how ignorant I am, but haven't provided one sin yet that Reagan committed.

This is one guy you'll have to deal with when you start trying to disemble Ronald Reagan. If you're not smart enough to avoid doing it, youl'll get your ass handed to you every time.

When are you going to start?

Why should I tell you. It wouldn't help.

You have no facts--you merely ASSERT. Then when something Reagan did is pointed out you whine "It wasn't his fault, he just made it into law!"

You trumped up a charge against Reagan by ignoring a very significant portion of the bill he signed. Then you give everyone else a pass, and fault me for pointing it out. LOL

You just keep repeating the same silliness of people who don't read about Reagan anywhere but on the internet, who can't understand how one can point out (here it comes, get ready) SINS of someone they admire, and still consider that person the best of their kind.

...we forget many of the sins perpetrated by the genuinely great Ronald Reagan...

You don't consider him to be anything of the kind. You have damned him for doing his best to end illegal immigration. You have said that Iran Contra was a huge mistake. You stated that he didn't bring down the USSR. You are one hell of a big fan.

You have a curious need to spout silliness as if you're afraid of not being seen as in total support of the man. Hmmmm...curious.

Afraid of not supporting him? Bud, you are one sick puppy. I have never acted as if I didn't, even when conversing with Democrats. After reading your comments here though, I cannot imagine why you would stick around.

You've got all the DU talking points down, spout them at will, and then say that you think Reagan was the best. Bull!

For someone who claims to know about Reagan you have a curious lack of understanding of his presidency. You can worship him as a perfect person, but I doubt he'd appreciate such unthinking idolatry.

Let me know when you're going to start listing his sins.

You stated he committed may sins. What a dumb ass.

Word of advice--when calling someone a dumb ass, you need to spell "many" properly. Dumbass.

Let me know when you're going to start listing his sins.

You are obsessed with that comment, and keep repeating it over and over and over in an effort to prove something. All you are proving is your lack of intelligence.

I'd continue posting about this topic, but it's not about Reagan. Now it's about you. You apparently have no life and have to model yourself as a protector of Reagan in order to somehow connect your sorry life to the great man's.

My love and admiration for Reagan doesn't mean I do not see him as he was--a human being, who did some great things and some not-so-great.

But you're not interested in any of that. You're not interested in Reagan the Man. You're only interested in your childish insults as a way of linking yourself to someone you profess to like yet know nothing about that wasn't handed to you.

You are incapable of serious discussion because you have no understanding of the subject at hand beyond what others have told you. Thus, talking to you is a waste of my time.

"I guess you're saying Reagan never committed sins?" So far you haven't provided any evidence that he did.

So Reagan never committed a sin?

You are a scary person in need of help.