To: RightWhale
DNA is not life. They might make a new species of something, that has been going on for decades.
I don't recall saying that DNA was life. I don't recall ANYONE saying it was. I'm still confused as to what is "BS" in your opinion. Since you're arguing that DNA is "NOT LIFE", which by the way is technically correct, I'm not sure what you're talking about. DNA is REQUIRED, at least on our planet, to be considered life though. In fact, everything considered to be a life form contains DNA. It's actually an instruction set for life, and every cell in your body has it (the same DNA, by the way).
I guess I'm not sure what you're arguing about, since you're right about them trying to create life for decades. I believe I pointed that out myself a bit earlier.
60 posted on
01/25/2008 12:16:42 PM PST by
Rick.Donaldson
(http://www.transasianaxis.com - Visit for lastest on DPRK/Russia/China/Etc --Fred Thompson for Prez.)
To: Rick.Donaldson
Some cells do not contain DNA. Your red blood cells do not take on their life mission until the DNA is removed.
62 posted on
01/25/2008 12:22:43 PM PST by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson