Posted on 01/24/2008 7:07:40 AM PST by xsysmgr
Beyond the melodrama of Sen. Hillary Clinton's tears-on-her-pillow triumph in New Hampshire and her gaming victory in Nevada lies the profoundly disturbing question of the Clintons' hidden record of suspected crimes.
It's that very record which likely prompted Sen. John Kerry's sudden endorsement of Sen. Barack Obama just two days after Mrs. Clinton's first primary win, followed by two more supportive votes from ranking congressional Democrats.
Their swift response was a clear sign that ranking Democratic colleagues are determined to derail Mrs. Clinton. Why? Because there exists a vault of information American voters are not aware of concerning the Clintons — information which should have been brought to the nation's attention well before the kickoff of the 2008 presidential campaign.
>
The bedeviling problem is that party leaders on both sides of the congressional aisle conspired two years ago to bury the telltale documents...120 missing pages of the Barrett Report which, ...contain sufficient evidence of Clinton misdeeds not only to furl Mrs. Clinton's presidential flag but quite possibly to send her and her miscreant husband straight to the courtroom dock. Yet the papers have lain moldering in some deep Capitol Hill tomb with no one daring to dig them up though they can be exhumed on demand by any member of Congress.
...Why grasp at the desperate straw of redaction? ...Suppressed evidence cannot remain suppressed forever and the Republicans are well aware of the wild card they have in the hole. Odds are that's why no Republican congressman has as yet unearthed the missing pages: The Republicans are banking on Mrs. Clinton, the scenario goes, to win the Democratic nomination so they can bake her in Mr. Barrett's oven in the election campaign.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Ping - Thought you might like to read this
I would love to see a convention like that.
I have written a letter to Sen. Wayne Allard asking for an unredacted copy of the report. He is retiring this year so he is in a position to do so.
He should get my letter late this week or early next week.
It may well be an interesting read, but it's not too terribly relevant now. The convention process is considerably different than it was in the 1800s.
To answer the original question, I know of no rule that prohibits the selection of a person who has dropped out or has chosen not to run. As a matter of practical reality (given that a substantial number of delegates are bound either permanently or through a number of votes), it won't happen.
This is a prime example the fundamental weakness of conservative politics: time and time again, we rely on "Winning the One Big Battle," and pin our hopes on "The Damning Evidence." We demand it all, and get pissy and mad when we don't get it.
And this, in a nutshell, is what is why conservatives are in trouble today. Are we really so bereft of ideas that we have to rely on "aces in the hole?"
BTW ... not picking on you, specifically. I randomly picked this comment among the many similar on this thread.
None of them do. Disgusting, isn't it?
Frankly, I think this is giving the Congressional GOP far too much credit for devious, tactical thinking. (Sorry to say)
B.S. 900 FBI files are her insurance against any disclosures. Too many slimy politicians are concerned for themselves above all........
“Whats his name? Maybe we can ALL write him!”
The “honorable” Mike Castle from the State of Delaware.
Good luck on getting him to do more than collect this check.
OMG! UBER RINO!
I need to drop off a DVD for this reporter. Perhaps Hillary should be asked about IRS abuses when she is deposed in Paul v Clinton.
If the Republican nominee is Giuliani, all of his social problems will be trumpeted 100% of the time from nomination until election by MSM and, for Republicans, such things are NOT resume enhancement.
Sounds like a plan!
I couldn’t get past this line. The only reason Kerry endorsed Obama is because he thinks Obama is gonna win. That’s it. That’s all. Not because he suddenly grew a conscience. Not because he has the keys to Al Capone’s secret Clinton Vault of Shame. Same with Leahy - does anyone think this man, INFAMOUS for his leaking national security secrets to anyone who will listen - suddenly has America’s best interests at heart? These are people who know they will be on the out in a new Clinton administration, and are doing everything in their power to prevent that.
If they had any concerns about Clinton criminal involvement they picked a strange time to suddenly act on it. Right in the midst of a political election! This was opportunism, pure and simple.
Attempting to assign even vaguely admirable qualities to that dirtbag John Kerry does not pass muster.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.