Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reagan Man

I am concerned about the WOT, but since the heavy work has already been done in that quarter, McNasty really has nothing much more he can add there, except to screw it up, which is a good posibility. Romney and Rudy are far more conservative than McNasty, who is closer to Hillary ideologically than either of them. By the way, you ought to change your handle since McNasty is no Reaganite and Fred will likely soon be supporting McNasty, which his stalking horse strategy was designed to do all along. BTW, I may just decide to stick it to McNasty and not vote for him out of spite, and I think you’ll see the real hypocrite the next time you look into a mirror. Rush said he would support Rudy or Mitt if either is nominated, ditto for Mark Levin, as well as Rusty Humphrey and Mike Gallagher. I guess they are lib-lovers, too, or is your conservatism somehow, superior to theirs?


155 posted on 01/20/2008 4:44:03 PM PST by attiladhun2 (Islam is a despotism so vile that it would warm the heart of Orwell's Big Brother)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]


To: attiladhun2
>>>>>Romney and Rudy are far more conservative than McNasty

Since you're a liberal, I can understand why you feel that way. In my book, they all suck.

161 posted on 01/20/2008 4:53:58 PM PST by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson