Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton wins Dem caucus in Nevada
Chicago Sun-To,es ^ | January 19, 2008

Posted on 01/19/2008 1:22:20 PM PST by KeyLargo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-137 next last
To: Gator113

Why are you giving up aready?

This type of surrender gave the Congress to the dems in 2006

If anything get into the fight and defeat hillary

Our country is at stake


41 posted on 01/19/2008 2:07:27 PM PST by Rooivalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Just working the system. The Democrats were not smart to allow same-day registration. A number of Republicans I know did this, and when I announced I was going to do it in my precinct meeting a couple said they would entertain doing so.


42 posted on 01/19/2008 2:08:30 PM PST by Fausto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

People who want her to be the nominee are delusional. No, she will not be the easiest to beat.


43 posted on 01/19/2008 2:13:30 PM PST by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BerryDingle; xzins
Did anyone see Hillary's interview with Tara Banks where Hillary had the nerve to say that even after she found out about Bill's lying, cheating, adulterous actions with Lewinsky, she never doubted he loved her!!!

She didn't!?! What would it have taken for her to figure that one out!?!

Maybe if Bill had smacked Hillary across the face with that cigar she'd have a better clue as to Bill's "deep love for her."

Wake up, women!

This vile creature is saying that even men who humiliate women still really love them deep down. This is what battered women are told all the time by their batterers. For Hillary to tell victims they are loved by their abusers is repugnant.

44 posted on 01/19/2008 2:13:47 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Fausto

I am glad that you did. I think it is better to win against Hillary and MAYBE win against Obama. Obama is more dangerous than Hillary (possibly winning) IMHO.


45 posted on 01/19/2008 2:14:38 PM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

No kidding. Clintons cheat.


46 posted on 01/19/2008 2:15:05 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Looks like she has the La Raza crowd in her corner. How could any sane person vote for that idiot. Oh wait, only a commie liberal that hates America.
Respectfully,
NSNR


47 posted on 01/19/2008 2:18:49 PM PST by No Surrender No Retreat (Xin Loi My Boy!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Was it over by noon their time??


48 posted on 01/19/2008 2:19:00 PM PST by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rooivalk

I don’t disagree with most of what you said, but we don’t have a team like we once did, 2006 proved that.

Our party is too fractured to become the mighty force it needs to be to win. I hope I am wrong, but this is how I see it for now.

If you want to save the country, then please, prove me wrong.


49 posted on 01/19/2008 2:19:21 PM PST by Gator113 (My short list..Fred, Hunter, Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
I named a star for Hillary and will be delivering the certificate to her office this week.


50 posted on 01/19/2008 2:19:58 PM PST by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: conservativeinferno
I disagree. The Clintons will unleash Hell on the Republican. Everything from questionable background stuff to made up stuff that can’t be easily rebuffed will come out.

We want Obama to take the hit, but survive to win over her.

That’s safest for us.

51 posted on 01/19/2008 2:20:41 PM PST by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17; KeyLargo

Behold the problem of the Vagina Vote.


52 posted on 01/19/2008 2:21:19 PM PST by Old Sarge (This tagline in memory of FReeper 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
At first I was hoping she would lose i Nevada, big-time, just for the entertainment value of watching the Clintons blow up (especially Bill), but the bottom line is that she is still the most defeatable candidate the Dems have, so let them build their whole thing up to a monumental defeat at the polls in November.

Watching their setbacks in state primaries just doesn't have that same ring to it.

I want to see more of their trickery and deceit exposed...they've got enough out there and it can't stay hidden forever.

This should end up with the electorate giving a big "thumbs down" to the Clinton Klan and all they stand for. If not, those of us who survived two terms of Clinton and one of Jimmy Carter know the drill.

53 posted on 01/19/2008 2:21:26 PM PST by capt. norm (Those who think logically provide a nice contrast to the real world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Hildebeast wins Nevada...Another stomp backwards in civilization.

Hitler in 1933.


54 posted on 01/19/2008 2:22:48 PM PST by eleni121 (+ En Touto Nika! By this sign conquer! + Constantine the Great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Looks like Hillary is the Dem nominee.


55 posted on 01/19/2008 2:24:38 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proudpapa; conservativeinferno
Hillary will be the easiest to beat in the general elections.

I disagree. The general election will turn on how good the Dem contender's side is at vote-fraud. The Clinton's are the most dangerous

56 posted on 01/19/2008 2:25:08 PM PST by PapaBear3625
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

You are wrong. There are many Americans who do not want this country to become a socialist/marxist state. The clintons are the best representation of socialism in the dem party. They are 60’s holdovers and if they don’t get in now, they never will. The msm can only hold the line for them to the uninformed electorate. This is primary season and little comes from this. The real meat and potatoes will come after the nominees are named. This inexperienced candidate will come to full bloom during the general election. There will be strong forces at work to inform the electorate of her not ready for prime time status....


57 posted on 01/19/2008 2:26:49 PM PST by The Forgotten Man (He works, he votes, generally he prays--but he always pays....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: CaspersGh0sts
Is it just me, or did the Republicans just turn out more voters than the Dems for the first time?

None of the cable news channels are telling you that the democrat count is apparently delegates to the county conventions. According to their official caucus site, the dems had 107,000 people participating in the caucus. (For more info, go to http://www.nvdemscaucus.com/ )

The Republicans are reporting the straw vote counts, but they also elect county delegates. It looks like the Republican turnout will be about 44,000. (for more info, go to http://www.nvgopcaucus.com/ )

58 posted on 01/19/2008 2:29:02 PM PST by ravinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: CaspersGh0sts
Romney: 17,680 (with 41% reporting)
Clinton: 4,958 (with 85% reporting)
Obama: 4,398 (with 85% reporting)
Edwards: 363 (with 85% reporting)

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/state/#NV

Is it just me, or did the Republicans just turn out more voters than the Dems for the first time?

This is the same thing as in Iowa. The Dems and Reps run their caucuses differently. The Rep numbers are voters (via straw poll), the Dem numbers are delegates (for example, the Dem caucus they showed on CNN had 86 votes for Obama and 80 for Hillary. The numbers reported, though, were 16 delegates for Hillary and 17 for Obama).

59 posted on 01/19/2008 2:31:45 PM PST by saquin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
You forget that millions idolize this creature.

The same was true in many cases revealed in the Bible.

It wasn't the likes of regular folks (although many were suckered in) that went down in flames....it was the biggies...the kings, pharaohs and other assorted big cheeses.

A little guy going down is not big news. A big time politician that's in the news every day, meeting that same fate, gets attention and can serve as a lesson if we're willing to pick up on the 'clues'.

You could equate it from the old Mafia saying "A fish rots from its head" The Clintons are not killing, but seriously wounding the Dem. Party for their own selfish purposes.

Who among us hasn't already seen something along this line coming?

60 posted on 01/19/2008 2:34:10 PM PST by capt. norm (Those who think logically provide a nice contrast to the real world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-137 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson