Posted on 01/19/2008 7:54:17 AM PST by Mr. Silverback
In the stuffy world of politics, the Ron Paul campaign has earned the reputation of being something like a raucous, freedom-loving party. A raucous, freedom-loving party with lots of paranoid bigots. So it would probably be more surprising if the band reportedly headlining RonPaulapalooza didn't have a few teeny-tiny problems with the Jews, who they feel are trying to destroy everybody. The band Poker Face enjoys churning out a hard-chargin' "freedom rock" that they developed under the influence of Boston, the Beatles, and Frank Zappa, as well as a firm conviction that the Holocaust did not happen and that the Jews are in fact the lead agents of a "Satanic World Order."
And according to a notice sent out by RonPaulaplooza organizers, you can get yourself a taste when Poker Face (along with some "lesser-known bands") rocks the big event, now tentatively scheduled for the Fourth of July holiday weekend in Morehead, Kentucky. As of post time, organizers had not responded to Radar's anxious inquiries about the possible co-appearance of a sassy little slice of pizza known to sling some fairly dope rhymes about the Ron Paul revolution.
I'm not afraid of anything you might dredge up to try to libel the President. Conspiracy theories mean diddly.
I’m certain it’s true I saw it on line.
So, you're saying Radar is lying?
I am not a proffesional writer. I have never stated so. Where did you pull that one out?
Yeah, I'm sure if he said "Vote for Fre dThompson because he has the best record on federalism" they'll all get right in line behind a candidate who is pledged to continue the war in Iraq.
Thank you...you're too kind.
Could you give me a link to something showing they wanted Jane’s Addiction? I saw the reference to Jane’s Addiction on Radar, but I figured it was sarcasm.
Ron Paul makes his political position clear on 9/11 Truth
Ron Paul on Neil Cavuto (Denounces Don Black & white supremacists)
Ron Paul talking about white supremacists (Denounces white supremacists, PBS interview)
“So, you’re saying Radar is lying?”
They’re seriously misrepresenting.
You’re shilling.
Are you Nick Curran?
Yes, that's true and good for him if he's a good OB. I hope he goes back to it. However, this is not a mere lack of diligence or distraction. This is a guy saying, "I'll put something out with my name on it for years at a time and not check on it." That is collossally inept. That makes JFK getting his boat cut in half by a destroyer look like Washington at Yorktown.
“Yes, that’s true and good for him if he’s a good OB. I hope he goes back to it. However, this is not a mere lack of diligence or distraction. This is a guy saying, “I’ll put something out with my name on it for years at a time and not check on it.” That is collossally inept. That makes JFK getting his boat cut in half by a destroyer look like Washington at Yorktown.”
Fred represented marxist, voodoo-cultist, and Marxist dictator Aristide for FREE.
AFTER Aristide gave an interview about how sweet the burning flesh of his opponents smelled.
He lobbied John Sununu on his behalf.
Doesn’t it bother you that he “can’t recall” the content of the conversation?
Let me know when you post on the subject, into breaking or front page news. I won’t hold my breath.
Boston.com interviewed Fred about it and he dissembled.
Is Fred ready to be President?
It appears that won't happen.
If there were credible report after credible report that Fred had sex with men like there's report after credible report of Nazis and Truthers glomming onto Ron Paul, and in the latter case being encouraged by him?
If Fred had published a newsletter for years under his name that had articles on how great it is to be bisexual, and then said the thoughts weren't his and he should have been paying better attention?
If the American Thinker was publishing stuff like this, only with link after link detailing Fred's supposed preference for men?
I think it would stay in Front Page news just fine. The problem is, those things aren't happening to Fred.
BTW, are you aware that you just attacked my candidate with a piece written by a liberal and hosted by a liberal publication? By your logic, that makes you a lib. I don't think you are, but it's always nice to see someone hoist on their own petard.
And a guy who couldn't steer such a ship would never be able to shrink it.
” BTW, are you aware that you just attacked my candidate with a piece written by a liberal and hosted by a liberal publication? By your logic, that makes you a lib. I don’t think you are, but it’s always nice to see someone hoist on their own pe”
Actually I was posting it BECAUSE it was similar to what you did.
Not because I think it’s true.
Now you get it I hope?
BTW I was talking about Fred and his client Aristide most recently. You abandoned the other points long ago.
“It appears that won’t happen.”
When will Fast Freddie stop playing dunce on his lobbying for a marxist, voodoo worshiper and mass murderer, for free?
It tells me that there are several Paul supporters on this board so deranged they really believe that being in favor of a win in Iraq is the same as being in Rudy Giuliani's employ. That's like saying that liking the color blue means you work for GM, because they make blue trucks.
Again, you don’t get it. Take you and I personally out of the discussion and step back and think. Even take Paul’s ideology out of the discussion.
American voters see the large proportion of offensive and wacko people enthusiastically promoting a candidate. They see that candidate’s signs along with the anti-war, anti-Bush and anti-American signs in protests. That turns off average, normal, work-a-day Americans. I know my first look at a Paulbearer gave me a “what the heck was that nut all about” thought.
Paul’s views have attracted the offensive fringe. The offensive fringe shadowing him is catching the eye of mainstream America and they are repulsed by that. The guy peaked when he was an unknown with a “revolution”. As he and his retinue become visible, he is being rejected. His cult may continue to push him along. Mainstream America rejects him.
Like Barny Fife this guy has only one bullet in his pocket.
Which is what the accusations on Paul are. Most accusing him of being pro-terrorist for example completely ignore the fact he proposed Letters of Marques and Reprisals as an alternative which may have actually worked more efficently.
So, you're saying Radar is lying?
Why should you care you'll believe what you want to believe and what you favorite one running tells you to believe whom BTW is McCains political twin.
If you throw a rock at a pack of dogs, the one who gets hit will yelp. The more I see pathetic slime-balls like this try to drag Ron Paul down with mud and unsubstantiated paranoid delusions, the more I’m starting to like him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.