Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fred Thompson — Reliable Conservative
NewsMax.com ^ | January 18, 2008 | By: David Limbaugh

Posted on 01/18/2008 5:58:15 PM PST by Jim Robinson

Commentators are citing the unpredictability of the Republican primary contests as proof that Reagan conservatism is dead when precisely the opposite conclusion is warranted.

The main reason the conventional wisdom is being shattered in the primaries is that conservative voters, so far, have not been persuaded there is an electable, reliable conservative in the race.

But as I've stated before, I believe Fred Thompson is a reliable, consistent conservative. There are others in the field I could support, but not without some reservations. The more I learn about Fred and observe him in action, the more convinced I become that he's the right choice.

I was among those who urged Fred to step up and prove to the people he wanted the job. Regardless of whether Fred actually had "fire in his belly," the unmistakable perception out there was that he did not, so I encouraged him to add a little spring to his step.

But I've also appreciated Fred's unwillingness to be somebody he is not. He will not respond like a puppet when a debate moderator tells him to raise his hand to signify a childishly simplistic approval or disapproval of a certain policy. He will not be goaded by interviewers into saying things he doesn't feel comfortable saying. He won't divide us with class envy or pretend we can be friends with rogue regimes or terrorists.

He does not promise a chicken in every pot or pander to liberals on global warming.

He will not otherwise tailor his positions to suit the demands of particular constituencies. For example, he has the courage to preach that Social Security is in trouble, but unlike most others, he doesn't surrender to the oppressive populist seduction to urge government fixes for it or for healthcare. Instead, he courageously tells us — if we'll listen — that the answers lie in greater market forces. (Listen up, conservatives.)

Fred does not run from his record; more to the point, he doesn't need to. He shoots straight without the constant self-serving reminders that he does, as in telling us he's driving the "Straight Talk Express."

More importantly, Fred is right on the issues, and there's little doubt his positions are firm. Research his stances; read his position papers. You'll find he's very strong in all areas important to mainstream conservatives, including national defense, taxes, spending, life, immigration, federalism, appointing originalist judges, healthcare, and education.

I'm not drooling over Fred or saying his record is flawless, but I am saying he's the real deal, and it's a bit disappointing that more haven't taken a closer look.

I think this is due partly to his laid-back personality and partly to his timing. He peaked about the time he was contemplating entering the race but not acting on it. By the time he jumped in, it was anticlimactic, and he still hasn't recovered from that reversal.

There has also been a negative momentum hovering over his already-stalled campaign, acting as a psychological barrier to his catching fire among conservative voters.

There is simply too much herd mentality among us about electability. We tell ourselves a candidate is not inspiring, then pretty soon we're convinced he's unelectable, and, voila, he almost becomes so. Yet, at that very moment, he's proving to us that he is quite presidential, quite electable and quite motivated for the job — if we can only shed our predispositions against his "electability."

Since electability is often a matter of collective perception, it can turn on a dime, as with the reversal of the respective fortunes of screaming Howard Dean and somniferous John Kerry in 2004.

This primary season, relatively speaking, has just begun. But Fred is now up against the wall. How can we expect him to have done much better than he has to date with everyone prattling on about the overwhelming odds against him? The "experts" continue to be wrong at almost every turn, so why can't they be wrong about Fred, too?

It's time to quit empowering them by following their dictatorial doom-prophecies. It’s encouraging that John Zogby's latest South Carolina poll shows that while levels of support for McCain and Huckabee "have remained static," Fred is starting to move up.

Supporters have asked Fred to step up, and he has — he has shone brilliantly in the last month, setting himself head and shoulders above the pack in many cases. Now it's time for conservative voters to step up and quit placing artificial limitations on Fred, and on themselves.

Fred has answered the conservatives' call. Shouldn't we answer his?

David Limbaugh is a writer, author, and attorney. His book "Bankrupt: The Intellectual and Moral Bankruptcy of Today's Democratic Party" (Regnery) was recently released in paperback. To find out more about David Limbaugh, please visit his Web site at www.davidlimbaugh.com


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections; fred; fredthompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last
To: ImpBill

Thanks for the ping Imp.

I now have a ping list of individuals whose principles outweigh expediency. It almost feels like sitting among the signers of The “Declaration of Independence.”

(*)
Hmmmmm, maybe we should work together and come up with our own declaration of independence from the republican party. Just in case?


61 posted on 01/19/2008 10:51:01 AM PST by DonnerT (Accepting the lesser of two evils is the greatest evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
...it’s a very prersonal choice, and I try to not get too exercised over a disagreement.

Yup. Sound policy. Me too.

62 posted on 01/19/2008 10:52:32 AM PST by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
I think I should have punged you to This Post
63 posted on 01/19/2008 10:56:16 AM PST by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: DonnerT

Not yet dummy! There’s still hope and prayer.


64 posted on 01/19/2008 10:56:49 AM PST by DonnerT (Accepting the lesser of two evils is the greatest evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: ImpBill

Thanks bud. I hear ya.


65 posted on 01/19/2008 12:12:40 PM PST by DoughtyOne (< fence >< sound immigration policies >< /weasles >< /RINOs >< /Reagan wannabees that are liberal >)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

I hope you’re better at it than I am. LOL


66 posted on 01/19/2008 12:49:37 PM PST by DoughtyOne (< fence >< sound immigration policies >< /weasles >< /RINOs >< /Reagan wannabees that are liberal >)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne; Dr. Zoo
Well the Doctor (not Dr. Zoo, the real one...) says no stress so I don't do stress.

Some of the people that I post to...quite calmly I might add...well, I sometimes have to pull back so they don't have a heart attack or sumpin' like that...LOL

67 posted on 01/19/2008 12:57:41 PM PST by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

I do get frustrated when I supply a lot of material the reader agrees with, yet when the conclusion comes they can’t pull the trigger. They still act as if they hadn’t heard and agreed with what I said.

Then there’s the person who’ll give you three things that please them about their guy, and after you’ve provided twenty they can’t refute, they let you know they adore their guy even more.

Now that drives me batty.


68 posted on 01/19/2008 1:05:46 PM PST by DoughtyOne (< fence >< sound immigration policies >< /weasles >< /RINOs >< /Reagan wannabees that are liberal >)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
But I've also appreciated Fred's unwillingness to be somebody he is not.

A candidate who totes conviction?

Nah, can't be for true conservatism is dead, right?

Fred IS the best that conservatism has to slow the incessant drive to socialism in our time.

69 posted on 01/19/2008 1:07:11 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson