Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney proposes $250 bln economic stimulus package
Reuters ^

Posted on 01/18/2008 5:08:54 PM PST by Sub-Driver

Romney proposes $250 bln economic stimulus package Fri Jan 18, 2008 7:33pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Weighing in on a debate about stimulating the slowing U.S. economy, Republican presidential contender Mitt Romney called on Friday for a package of tax breaks expected to cost $250 billion, according to a report by the CNBC business TV channel.

The former Massachusetts governor's package, CNBC said, centered on several permanent tax cuts, rather than temporary rebates and spending programs favored by others engaged in the stimulus discussion in Washington and on the campaign trail.

Romney plans to propose permanently reducing the rate for the lowest income tax bracket to 7.5 percent from 10 percent, retroactive to 2007, eliminating Social Security payroll taxes for workers over 65 and eliminating capital gains and dividend taxes on households earning under $200,000 a year, CNBC said on its Web site.

He would also permanently reduce the corporate tax rate to 20 percent from 35 percent over two years and allow businesses to depreciate the value of new equipment purchases faster.

CNBC said an aide to Romney pegged the total cost of his package at about $250 billion.

President George W. Bush earlier on Friday called on Congress to enact a package of temporary tax cuts and other measures estimated to cost up to $150 billion.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: flipflop; gungrabber; pandering; rino; romney; taxcuts; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-164 next last
To: HwyChile
A tax cut or ... here's a crazy idea...

JUST SPEND LESS MONEY!!!

101 posted on 01/18/2008 7:48:42 PM PST by airborne (Proud to be a conservative! Proud to support Duncan Hunter for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

Who will he try to bribe with their own money next? Floridians I guess...


102 posted on 01/18/2008 7:51:06 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Mitt Romney hates lobbyists...even though a whole crowd of them are running his campaign...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: TWhiteBear
“I do not buy into the Marxian robotic economic man as the only, sole motivator. I have social and leadership criteria that is also important to me.”

What exactly does that mean? You obviously do not know anything about Mormons. Mormons are very Conservative when it comes to social policy. Furthermore, they are highly thought of when it comes to good character (honest, good citizens, etc.). Remember, we are not electing a preacher of a church. We are electing a president.

103 posted on 01/18/2008 7:53:24 PM PST by HwyChile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
“Vote-buying is not a conservative principle.”

If conservaitve tax cuts are vote buying, then you are an idiot.

104 posted on 01/18/2008 7:56:33 PM PST by HwyChile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: airborne
~"If you really want to stimulate the economy, how about not taking the $250 billion in the first place!"~

Umm... that's the idea.


Hello? McFly!
105 posted on 01/18/2008 7:56:47 PM PST by tantiboh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Just when I think you might be sane you zing us with ....

“Who will he try to bribe with their own money next?”

This is exactly what leftists said about the Reagan and G W B tax cuts. Never mind the absurdity of ‘bribing’ someone *with their own money*! How about “restoring an unjust and anti-growth expropriation”?

Are you really saying the Reagan / G W B / Romney tax rate cut economic prescription to avoid recession is bad policy?

Or are you clueless about supply-side economics and the growth benefits of incentivizing the eocnomy with tax rate cuts?


106 posted on 01/18/2008 7:57:52 PM PST by WOSG (Proamnesty-antiBushtaxcuts-proCO2caps-CFR-RINO John McCain delenda est!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

~”Vote-buying is not a conservative principle.”~

Soo... when Reagan spoke about cutting taxes, that was vote buying?

EV, you’ve shot yourself in the foot here. I suggest you cut your losses and retreat. Save yourself the additional embarrassment.


107 posted on 01/18/2008 7:58:20 PM PST by tantiboh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: airborne

“JUST SPEND LESS MONEY!!!”

Bingo! We have a winner folks. That is the real key to our problems. Too much government spending.


108 posted on 01/18/2008 7:58:43 PM PST by HwyChile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: airborne

If we cut spending yet keep the tax rates too high, the economy will still suffer.
Best plan is to DO BOTH. Good news is that romney plans to do just that.


109 posted on 01/18/2008 7:59:14 PM PST by WOSG (Proamnesty-antiBushtaxcuts-proCO2caps-CFR-RINO John McCain delenda est!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

Correct. Cut spending and reduce taxes. Reagan would be proud that some people get it.


110 posted on 01/18/2008 8:00:56 PM PST by HwyChile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: HwyChile

If you want to cut taxes, cut taxes. Just don’t act like you’re doing the American people a favor. Because the second you do act like you’re doing the American people some kind of favor, one that merits a vote, you’ve gone over to the dark side with those who started and continue the federal income tax for exactly that purpose.


111 posted on 01/18/2008 8:01:22 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Mitt Romney hates lobbyists...even though a whole crowd of them are running his campaign...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

While we’re at it, let’s put Congress on the socialized medicine program and see how they like it.


112 posted on 01/18/2008 8:04:13 PM PST by airborne (Proud to be a conservative! Proud to support Duncan Hunter for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Wow. That is pretty deep. I just want tax cuts and less spending. I could care less about whether it is a favor. It will certainly get my vote, so I guess he would be buying my vote with that policy.


113 posted on 01/18/2008 8:04:14 PM PST by HwyChile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Can you blame Romney?

He did win Michigan after promising 100 billion to the auto industry.

He figures if he goes even bigger he might win SC? Maybe even Florida?

I predict his #s will only grow!!


114 posted on 01/18/2008 8:06:36 PM PST by JRochelle (John Thune in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

Tax cuts are good. Just pointing out the next vote is in SC and he promises tax cuts. Last vote was in Michigan and he promised 20 billion in spending for research. The next primary after SC is in Florida and I am guessing he will have something special to offer the seniors and Cuban Americans.


115 posted on 01/18/2008 8:07:19 PM PST by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: HwyChile

And you wonder why we get such crappy politicians. Wanna bet you never get your paltry tax cut? But, even if you do, it will never be worth the price you had to pay for it.


116 posted on 01/18/2008 8:07:46 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Mitt Romney hates lobbyists...even though a whole crowd of them are running his campaign...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

We are supposed to forget about Michigan.....


117 posted on 01/18/2008 8:09:28 PM PST by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: khnyny
By the same logic, if it was Romney who was standing there giving the speech to the Russians...

'Mr Gorbachav-Tear DOWN THIS WALL"---These anti Mitts would start saying "I bet he would use tax payer money for that..He is a big government liberal pandering to the demolition industry"

Their criticisms fall neatly into the insane category.

118 posted on 01/18/2008 8:12:03 PM PST by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

So will the bill.

Gosh, by the time he’s done, no one will have to pay any taxes at all, and he’ll be paying us!

“There’s a sucker born every minute.”


119 posted on 01/18/2008 8:12:27 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Mitt Romney hates lobbyists...even though a whole crowd of them are running his campaign...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: No.6
Not if someone is a Mitt hater. Those people have lost their moral compass and thats about it.

Tax cuts are good unless Mitt Romney proposes one!!! That is their motto....

120 posted on 01/18/2008 8:15:01 PM PST by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-164 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson