CCG, you are such a disengenuous...thingy. Now you are outright lying. Ex Post Facto only applies to to making an action CRIMINAL AFTER it happens. It has nothing to do with redifining a law that was missapplied...as in this case.
It was discussed at length and several FR attorneys over the last year have stated that such and that a law could be passed to free them. You demanded I verify it and I did. Now you claim you refuted while you did no such thing except flapping your gums and making things up.
You’re a lying, manipulative, deceitful person. Nothing you say can be trusted.
FR attorneys? Who are they if you could be specific, and how exactly do you know these people on the Internet are attorneys? And if you have contacted them and used their services, please provide their contact information here.
Thanks.
Thanks sweetums. From you, that is a compliment. (black is white, white is black).
Now you are outright lying. Ex Post Facto only applies to to making an action CRIMINAL AFTER it happens. It has nothing to do with redifining a law that was missapplied...as in this case.
BobJ... FR's newly declared super-duper-expert-constitutional attorney? Why not answer the questions then and provide support? It's not like you weren't asked multiple times.
It was discussed at length and several FR attorneys over the last year have stated that such and that a law could be passed to free them. You demanded I verify it and I did. Now you claim you refuted while you did no such thing except flapping your gums and making things up.
You haven't verified anything. In fact, your claims seem to be going up in smoke. Perhaps you could direct us to the posts of those "several FR attorneys," or you could ping them, as I haven't seen a single post from an FR attorney backing your claims. Discussed at length? No! You spamming threads with baseless claims does not qualify as "discussion" (IMHO).
You’re a lying, manipulative, deceitful person. Nothing you say can be trusted.
I believe this qualifies as a personal attack, no?