Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Joint Chiefs chairman: close Guantanamo
AP Via Yahoo! News ^ | Jan 13, 2008 | Robert Burns

Posted on 01/13/2008 3:31:02 PM PST by MichMash

GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba - The chief of the U.S. military said Sunday he favors closing the prison here as soon as possible because he believes negative publicity worldwide about treatment of terrorist suspects has been "pretty damaging" to the image of the United States.

"I'd like to see it shut down," Adm. Mike Mullen said in an interview with three reporters who toured the detention center with him on his first visit since becoming chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff last October.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Cuba; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: biasmeanslayoffs; bushhassers; gitmo; gramsci; guantanamo; gwot; jointchiefs; liberalmedia; mediabias; mediajihad; mediawar; mikemullen; military; quisling; spartansixdelta; surrender; trysellingthetruth; usmilitary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 321-337 next last
To: MichMash
So is he trying to get a job with Osama Barrack or the Hildebeast?

It couldn't possibly be his professional opinion based upon a career spent trying to defend this country, could it?

101 posted on 01/13/2008 4:51:01 PM PST by jude24 (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichMash

I agree with him. The prisoners should be moved to a much more humane location-—the beautiful, pristine area of ANWR!!!!!


102 posted on 01/13/2008 4:51:22 PM PST by stockstrader (We need a conservative who will UNITE the Party, not a liberal who will DEMORALIZE it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fox_Mulder77

Do you have a point?


103 posted on 01/13/2008 4:54:28 PM PST by dbacks (Taglines for sale or rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: MichMash

The Jihadi’s never seem to worry about their IMAGE of TERROR. The DC tap water is being spiked with Estrogen.


104 posted on 01/13/2008 4:58:29 PM PST by VRWC For Truth (RINO cleaner - the backbone restorer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

Bush and Gates have been saying that they would like to shut it down. The devil is in the details. We can’t and shouldn’t shut it down. I am sure that Mullen believes he is stating the administrations position on Gitmo, i.e., we would love to shut it down but the issue is very complex. When you repeat what the CIC says, I don’t see how you can blame Mullen.


105 posted on 01/13/2008 4:58:40 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: MichMash

Send them to Egypt - they do not deserve to be on American soil.


106 posted on 01/13/2008 4:58:49 PM PST by edcoil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tlaloc

Gitmo is no “fraud”. It is a place where the worst examples of human debris are kept out of the pathetic U.S. judicial system. The SCOTUS has no authority here despite their verdict. I say force a Constitutional crisis. Let’s see if the people stand behind the liberals of the SCOTUS on this one.


107 posted on 01/13/2008 4:59:26 PM PST by Bishop_Malachi (Liberal Socialism - A philosophy which advocates spreading a low standard of living equally.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: MichMash

JCS speaking out on policy? That crosses a line.


108 posted on 01/13/2008 5:00:30 PM PST by NonValueAdded (Fred Dalton Thompson for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: barryg

barryg wrote:

“They don’t have as many legal rights in Gitmo. but the truth is German POWs were kept in the United States during WWII, and weren’t assigned ACLU lawyers.”

Here’s a few:

http://uboat.net/men/pow/pow_in_america_stats.htm

My son and I visited the ruins of one along the Appalachian trail this year in Pennsylvania. It was known as Camp Michaux and you can still see the graffiti left behind by the prisoners today.


109 posted on 01/13/2008 5:00:44 PM PST by Ned Buntline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
The Court today holds that the habeas statute, 28 U.S.C. § 2241 extends to aliens detained by the United States military overseas, outside the sovereign borders of the United States and beyond the territorial jurisdictions of all its courts.

Wrong! They ruled that Gitmo IS INSIDE the territorial jurisdiction of the US. They are right! Gitmo is NOT outside of the reach of the Supreme Court and liberals on the court have already conferred all kinds of rights on the detainees there! You can say otherwise until you are blue in the face but the law and the Supreme Court of the US disagree with you!

110 posted on 01/13/2008 5:02:17 PM PST by Tlaloc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
My point is this: ADM Mullen is repeating what the CIC and SECDEF have said about Gitmo on many occasions. They want to shut it down but the issue is very complex.

Read this story from the BBC US President George W Bush has said he would like to close the US prison camp at Guantanamo Bay and send many detainees back to their home countries.

111 posted on 01/13/2008 5:02:57 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

See my post #111. Bush wants to close Gitmo.


112 posted on 01/13/2008 5:04:25 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Tlaloc; indylindy
Gitmo is US soil. All US military bases are US soil.

Ummmm .... no, they are not.

All U.S. WARSHIPS are U.S. soil no matter where they may be floating.

The soil of a leased military base, like any any rented real estate, belongs to person receiving the rent check and not the person writing the rent check.

Castro: Cuba not cashing US Guantanamo rent checks

113 posted on 01/13/2008 5:05:32 PM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Tlaloc
You think no US court has jurisdiction over our US base at Gitmo!? Not even the Supreme Court!? What dream world do you live in? RASUL V. BUSH

This decision has no standing. Congress revised the laws as a result of this. Federal courts have no jurisdiction over habeas corpus of the Gitmo detainees. Judge Kennedy also tried to assert that Gitmo is US territory but considering the terminology of the lease, his opinion has no standing.

114 posted on 01/13/2008 5:08:00 PM PST by mesmerini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Tlaloc
You're filaments open pal which is why you're not one of the brighter bulbs I've met here of late.

Scalia is explaining why the liberals in Rasul were FOS. You support the liberals. Follow that to it's logical conclusion.

115 posted on 01/13/2008 5:08:08 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

If we cxlose it down...then do not let them go. Do what we are allowed under the Geneva Convenrtion for any of the detainees who are enemy combatants captured on the battlefield with no uniform and fighting under no orgainzed army...execute them, every single one of them.


116 posted on 01/13/2008 5:09:40 PM PST by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Polybius; Tlaloc

I would seem Tlaloc know’s more than any other person.

Facts don’t matter to them, they create their own.

Happens to be a Huckaproblem.


117 posted on 01/13/2008 5:10:10 PM PST by dforest (Duncan Hunter is the best hope we have on both fronts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: barryg
They don’t have as many legal rights in Gitmo. but the truth is German POWs were kept in the United States during WWII, and weren’t assigned ACLU lawyers.

They are NOT POWs, by any definition. They do not have the rights POWs have. They are no better than the murderers and saboteurs in the second world war. When they were caught, they were shot. No tears were shed, no cries of abuse. They should be tried by military tribunal the same as some german sabotuers were tried during WWII. If found guilty, they should be executed. No attorneys, no appeals. Close Gitmo when they are all either found guilty and executed, or not guilty and released.

118 posted on 01/13/2008 5:11:15 PM PST by jim-x (God help America survive its enemies within.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

With the wimpy status of US politics, they should have done that in the first place.

Heaven help us, it seems we have no stomach to stand up for ourselves.

Very sad.


119 posted on 01/13/2008 5:12:26 PM PST by dforest (Duncan Hunter is the best hope we have on both fronts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
The Supreme Court have ruled that the Geneva Conventions apply to detainees at Gitmo! The Bush administration acquiesced and ordered that all the detainees shall be treated according to the Geneva convention.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/11/AR2006071100455.html

The fact is that Gitmo IS within the territorial jurisdiction of US courts, and the President must obey their decisions, as he has! He has not kept these detainees from being protected by the Supreme Court, and he cannot!

120 posted on 01/13/2008 5:14:39 PM PST by Tlaloc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 321-337 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson