[wideawake]

In post #16 I said materially the same thing.

Saying he set the record straight in'01 is not an acknowledgement of the fact that he made the record crooked in the first place in '96.

Sp who was he protecting with his '96 lie? Who wrote those articles?

[GovernmentIsTheProblem]

“Saying he set the record straight in’01 is not an acknowledgement of the fact that he made the record crooked in the first place in ‘96.”

Sure it is.

Set the record straight. Npw you’re picking on phrasing.

“Sp who was he protecting with his ‘96 lie? Who wrote those articles?”

I have no idea. If you find out, let me know.

I suggest you read a little more about thompson/aristide first though. It’s real interesting.

After all, Paul has no chance to win, but Thompson does.

[mnehring]

The name that is being floated over in the campaign forums is Lew Rockwell. He was fired from the National Review for making similar statements and he did write for Paul at the time. This is all speculation (probably grasping at straws by the desperate) but the reason Paul hasn’t outed Rockwell is because he does so much for the campaign.