“Saying he set the record straight in’01 is not an acknowledgement of the fact that he made the record crooked in the first place in ‘96.”
Sure it is.
Set the record straight. Npw you’re picking on phrasing.
“Sp who was he protecting with his ‘96 lie? Who wrote those articles?”
I have no idea. If you find out, let me know.
I suggest you read a little more about thompson/aristide first though. It’s real interesting.
After all, Paul has no chance to win, but Thompson does.
He does? Even Paul outpolled him in NH and IA.
RCP has him running 5th in MI and 4th/5th in SC.
Looks like he's toast.
What's more interesting is that there only 1 site that has this information. The other sites that mention this basicly took the dirt and ran with it. The site that is prominant goes by the name of "Conservatives Against Fred Thompson".
Conservatives Against Fred Thompson
A thorough search of the "Conservatives Against Fred" site can find no information on who the staff is, who's posting the info, etc.
Who are they? Why the secrecy within the website? What are they trying to hide?
They have the following copyright towards the bottom of their "About Us" page:
"Copyright © 2007 Kansans For Life, all rights reserved."
Just one problem, KFL has no links to this anti-Fred site, and a search of their site comes up with no records about Fred Thompson. KFL is a member of the National Right to Life Committee, and the NRLC has endorsed Fred Thompson.
Here is what I found on the WHOIS search:
http://www.networksolutions.com/whois/results.jsp?domain=conservativesagainstfred.com
The article that's linked to in the anti-Fred site was written by the editorial director Justin Raimondo of antiwar.com:
So the ONLY site thats actually "dedicated" to trashing Thompson is more than likely something set up by a paul supporter just like the sites that were purportedly set up to "support" other Republican candidates.