To: Rick.Donaldson
This is a crock. I watched that segment. I am a Ham. But Romney was not dissing ham radio, he was simply discussing the changing capabilities of the State communication resources and the fact that the State can rely on their own systems for disaster communications.
Sheesh
55 posted on
01/10/2008 12:17:43 PM PST by
LukeSW
(The truth shall make you free!)
To: LukeSW
“This is a crock. I watched that segment. I am a Ham. But Romney was not dissing ham radio, he was simply discussing the changing capabilities of the State communication resources and the fact that the State can rely on their own systems for disaster communications.’
Citizens can’t rely on the state, though - which is why hams are so critical.
To: LukeSW
Luke, I think you and I had this discussion. Certainly your opinion and mine differ slightly, but from the people of his state, I would say Mr. Romney is not much better than his daddy was as a Liberal. He's NOT a conservative. Furthermore he is still a "tax and spend" guy. Sorry, I ain't buying your explanation (and I've seen the video and some other stuff I've not posted here). You're most definately entitled to that opinion you have of him. I'm sure your vote will be enjoyed by him as well. Mine, however, will NOT be given to him.
I suspect you as well are completely FAILING to understand the point her, as are several others. It's not about "Ham Radio". It's about principles. It's about his ignorance and lack of understanding of the ham community and "government infrastructure"... perhaps I should say, "Mr. Romney is a BIG Government guy and can't see the need for NOT spending money". How's that? Clearer?
81 posted on
01/10/2008 12:42:14 PM PST by
Rick.Donaldson
(http://www.transasianaxis.com - Visit for lastest on DPRK/Russia/China/Etc --Fred Thompson for Prez.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson