[SJackson]

I will admit, I have been reading the excuse the original author was fired, he may not have been, that may have been something they’ve been floating on blogs.

I believe that goes back to the Senate campaign disclosure of one article, LOS ANGELES RACIAL TERRORISM, in the mid 1990s. His reason for not releasing the newsletters was that it was a single occurance, now we know it wasn't. His reason for not releasing the name of the author was that he didn't work for him any longer, not sure if he actually said fired.

[mnehring]

Well, I guess we see what happened with the ‘single occurance’ comment they made then.

[bcsco]

I believe that goes back to the Senate campaign disclosure of one article, LOS ANGELES RACIAL TERRORISM, in the mid 1990s. His reason for not releasing the newsletters was that it was a single occurance, now we know it wasn't. His reason for not releasing the name of the author was that he didn't work for him any longer, not sure if he actually said fired.

Good grief! Where do you come up with this stuff? I am amazed and in admiration of one who's so on top of things. You amaze me every day.