Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul, get out of the Republican Party.
Modern Conservative ^ | Christopher Cook

Posted on 01/09/2008 8:54:49 AM PST by connell

Leave. Just go.

Mr. Paul, you are NOT a Republican. You may have views that intersect with some aspects of the Republican platform. That does NOT make you a Republican.

The Republican Party is a big tent movement. We don't apply nearly the same strictness when it comes to tests of ideological purity as the Democrats do, but we still have some standards. And you, sir, do not even come close to meeting them.

People who blame America for the acts of war made against it are not Republicans.

People who think that we blew up our own buildings on 9/11...or who hint that we might have...or who attract the support of people with such beliefs...are not Republicans.

People who may be receiving secret funding from George Soros...and who certainly receive energy and succor from radical leftists...are not Republicans.

People who have become the darling of, and the recipient of support from, America's neo-Nazis and white supremacists---and who refuse to openly repudiate that support---are not Republicans.

And people who publish racist, anti-Semitic, and anti-American newsletters...are not Republicans.

Oh, and your protestations of innocence regarding this racist, anti-Semitic, anti-American newsletter to which you attached your name are absurd. As Jonah Goldberg said yesterday on the Michael Medved show, if...

(Excerpt) Read more at modernconservative.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; gop; keepowt; ronpaul; ronpaulnewsletter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 481-484 next last
Comment #241 Removed by Moderator

To: connell

Ron Paul is real. He’s not in on it but others in other conservative forums have recently been banned as they were open border, country-club republicans for open borders masking themselves as Ron Paul supporters so they can take away votes from the Tancredos and Duncan Hunters of Election 2008 resulting in the McCains of our country ending up with a better chance to win.

Ron Paul is not in on this and neither are the many of his supporters but as one can see he does not have as many supporters as it appears. Many of the internet Ron Paul “supporters” are actually McCain voters. Sadly they are using Ron Paul to help their own candidate win. Luckily many conservative forums have caught on to this little trick.


242 posted on 01/09/2008 12:52:56 PM PST by tsowellfan (http://www.cafenetamerica.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentIsTheProblem

Open borders = REPUBLICAN.


243 posted on 01/09/2008 12:52:57 PM PST by jd777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
I believe that goes back to the Senate campaign disclosure of one article, LOS ANGELES RACIAL TERRORISM, in the mid 1990s. His reason for not releasing the newsletters was that it was a single occurance, now we know it wasn't. His reason for not releasing the name of the author was that he didn't work for him any longer, not sure if he actually said fired.

Good grief! Where do you come up with this stuff? I am amazed and in admiration of one who's so on top of things. You amaze me every day.

244 posted on 01/09/2008 12:53:14 PM PST by bcsco (Huckleberry Hound - Another dope from Hope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: junta
I’m told they threw Duke out so why can’t they throw Paul out if he is as bad as some of the posters here says he is?

They're trying to pimp Paul's congressional opponent Chris Peden, but have raised less than 1000 bucks for him so far. The poor guy can't even afford a non-free website.

245 posted on 01/09/2008 12:53:22 PM PST by jmc813 (Don't screw this up, vote for Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad
I know that he’s for legalization of dangerous drugs.

He wants the states to decide on drugs. If you oppose Roe v. Wade and also oppose Paul on this, you're a hypocrite.

246 posted on 01/09/2008 12:54:09 PM PST by jmc813 (Don't screw this up, vote for Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte

If by dismantling you mean cutting our forces down to the point where we no longer have an effective fighting force to deploy to locations around the world (or even in our own backyard) in a timely manner, then no, I do not need to modify my choice of words. That is Run Paul’s view of what our military should look like.


247 posted on 01/09/2008 12:54:33 PM PST by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Soldier home after 15 months in the Triagle of death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
That about sums it up. Most of them also have terrible grammar which adds a comedic angle to all of this

Be careful, Bucko. I smacked you down on that yesterday, I can do it again. You have little to be proud of in that respect.

248 posted on 01/09/2008 12:55:36 PM PST by bcsco (Huckleberry Hound - Another dope from Hope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
The poor guy can't even afford a non-free website.

Funny, if that was Paul you would say he is being fiscally conservative.

249 posted on 01/09/2008 12:56:20 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: jmc813

From what I’ve been able to gather from my research on Run Paul’s postions regarding the legalization of illicit drugs, that is what he espouses, not that the states should decide those issues. He, from what I’ve read of his statements, believes that illegal drugs should be legalized and the war against drugs ended. You may call me any name you wish, but that does not make you correct.


250 posted on 01/09/2008 12:57:51 PM PST by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Soldier home after 15 months in the Triagle of death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

It’s been discussed here for about 6 months


251 posted on 01/09/2008 12:57:58 PM PST by SJackson (If 45 million children had lived, they'd be defending America, filling jobs, paying SS-Z. Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Exactly, when people like that try to carry the party mantle, such as David Duke, we throw them out. It is the Democrats who embrace them and hold them up as the conscious of the senate (byrd).

I completely agree with you but you can’t deny that the Republican party is associated with racism more so than the democrap party in the collective mind of the USA. It’s an unfair and unfounded association to be sure but it’s there none the less.
With that being said, Republicans should be way less willing to play the “guilty of racism by association game”. The recent dethroning of Trent Lott should have been a strong lesson in this regard for Republicans and yet here we are playing the same game within the party because some of us don’t agree with Paul’s view on the constituional process of declaring and participating in war/armed conflict.


252 posted on 01/09/2008 12:58:31 PM PST by TheKidster (you can only trust government to grow, consolidate power and infringe upon your liberties.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

The only association has been through the lies of Democrats and socialists. They’ve never been true, so I see no reason to add a /sarc tag.

Strom Thurman


253 posted on 01/09/2008 12:59:24 PM PST by TheKidster (you can only trust government to grow, consolidate power and infringe upon your liberties.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
It’s been discussed here for about 6 months

Well, I guess I haven't been in the loop :)

254 posted on 01/09/2008 12:59:29 PM PST by bcsco (Huckleberry Hound - Another dope from Hope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
That's what the Paul folk have to rely on. Your grammar stinks, your name isn't Jewish enough, you're an infiltrator, you post somewhere else.

Facts, they don't exist.

A fine reflection on Freerepublic.

255 posted on 01/09/2008 12:59:39 PM PST by SJackson (If 45 million children had lived, they'd be defending America, filling jobs, paying SS-Z. Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: bcsco; SJackson
I just noticed something (OK, I saw on a paul forum someone else noticed it) from the press release on this.

This article rehashes an old issue of quotations from newsletters published under Dr. Paul's name, but not edited by him. Dr. Paul takes full responsibility, as he has for over a decade, for failing to adequately monitor the words that went out under his name.

They actually don't deny he wrote it, they are only denying he edited the newsletter. Considering the articles were written in first person, as from his hand, and some included a signature, it sure does make you wonder about this little slip. Maybe they are trying to say Paul's handlers dropped the ball?

256 posted on 01/09/2008 1:00:05 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: darkmatter
However, Romney does not strike me as a big government conservative, for all his faults and conversions.

You're obviously not an uninsured Massachusetts resident.

257 posted on 01/09/2008 1:01:14 PM PST by jmc813 (Don't screw this up, vote for Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: TheKidster
Maybe we are disagreeing on the form of ‘associated’ here? I am referring to direct association such as being involved with, you seem to be referring to association, such as impression or image?
258 posted on 01/09/2008 1:02:07 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
Amen to your post!

The political right equates freedom with national greatness brought about through military strength. Like the left, modern conservatives favor an all-powerful central state-- but for militarism, corporatism, and faith-based welfarism. Unlike the Taft-Goldwater conservatives of yesteryear, today’s Republicans are eager to expand government spending, increase the federal police apparatus, and intervene militarily around the world. The last tenuous links between conservatives and support for smaller government have been severed. “Conservatism,” which once meant respect for tradition and distrust of active government, has transformed into big-government utopian grandiosity. http://www.ronpaul2008.com/articles/161/what-does-freedom-really-mean/

259 posted on 01/09/2008 1:02:19 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (The power under the Constitution will always be in the people- George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Comment #260 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 481-484 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson