“Isn’t it obvious. It would be much better to have Hillary. She would shut down talk radio. She would issue executive orders and create law without congress (who would oppose her...the spineless GOP?). She would name two more Ruth Bader Ginzbergs to the Supreme Court. And, more importantly, she would have Doug from Upland whacked.”
Hillary would probably shut down all the conservative blogs. And you know what law gives her the power to do that? McCain-FeinGold. So Mcain is better?
Either way we are screwed with a pro-Amnesty socialist who calls himself a Republican (McCain or Huckabee or a pro-Amnesty socialist who calls herself a Democrat.
At least after 2 years of Hillary we could have a chance of getting a conservative Republican congress like happened after 2 years of Clinton. But then after those 2 years we might already be a socailist state though.
If our nominee is left stranded and people stay home, she may well have a veto-proof Senate. She will do things you cannot imagine.
No, it is not McCain-Feingold that allows her to shut down talk radio -— it is the fairness doctrine. She won’t even need congress to do it. Hillary will force the resignation of one of the FCC commissioners (or have him whacked), put in her own stooge, and institute the policy. The naivete of FReepers who do not know the danger this woman poses astounds me.