LOL! I was thinking the same thing. I'm listening to him explain that McCain may win, but the margin won't be the 9% it is now!
Vice President Hugh Hewitt will be unavailable for comment.
Posted on 01/08/2008 5:12:41 PM PST by jern
per fox news
I agree. If Fred bombs in South Carolina, then it would likely be over, and I’d be forced to go on Prozac.
:-)
LOL! I was thinking the same thing. I'm listening to him explain that McCain may win, but the margin won't be the 9% it is now!
Vice President Hugh Hewitt will be unavailable for comment.
America elected the current Congress. Now NH picks a freak like McCain.
Yeah, Hugh has picked some real winners in recent years -- from Willard to Harriet Miers.
He is a pathetic lap dog for the Republican party.
Uh, yeah. Gag me now.
Fred currently has 1.49% of the vote
Except a couple of states (Va, Ga) were called wrong for Clinton in 1996 by the networks, and I remember they called N.H. Senator Bob Smith the loser in 96 as well and he won.
He pitched his tent in this region since '94. Secured the tent in '02. Gave those 7% (of the Bay state) uninsured folks $50 abortions. Gave every conceivable multiple-choice voter a multiple-choice reason (at one pt or another) to vote for him. Spent millions of $ further securing NH in '07 & '08.
(And still lost to a 71 yo Beltway senator)
McCain will be another Dole for republican party. I will never support McCain no way no how!
This is not a traditional race like we've seen for the past 20 years. Guliani's support hasn't even begun to kick in, but it will in FL, NY, NJ, CT, and so on. Huck will probably fade some. So long as no candidate wins three in a row, I think ALL of them will stay in and it will be about amassing delegates, not, as in the past, winning states per se.
No problem they did that on the 6:30 Round table! Fox news will do whatever it takes to push amnesty.
Were you surprised that Rue Paul didn’t do better? One poll I saw had him in 4th, in double digits!
Somebody should tell Hugh that discernment is a better character trait to see in a candidate than simply intelligence.
Remember the words of WF Buckley, Jr: I will support the most conservative candidate in any election who has a legitimate opportunity to win. So, in the primary, if it’s Fred, fine. In the general, look for the next most “right-ward” guy.
If they did, it would be inaccurate because he and Huckabee right now share the title of frontrunner.
here’s an ap wire piece
—
On to elsewhere...
McCain wins GOP primary in New Hampshire
DAVID ESPO and PHILIP ELLIOTT
Associated Press
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/primary_rdp;_ylt=AhxXKuNSO2hqh7tX.SO7fTWs0NUE
CONCORD, N.H. - Arizona Sen. John McCain won the New Hampshire primary Tuesday night, completing a remarkable comeback and climbing back into contention for the Republican presidential nomination. Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton dueled with Sen. Barack Obama in an unexpectedly tight Democratic race.
“We showed the people of this country what a real comeback looks like,” McCain told The Associated Press in an interview as he savored his triumph. “We’re going to move on to Michigan and South Carolina and win the nomination.”
The Arizona senator rode a wave of support from independent voters to defeat former Gov. Mitt Romney of Massachusetts, a showing that reprised his victory in the traditional first-in-the-nation primary in 2000.
It was a bitter blow for Romney, who spent millions of dollars of his own money in hopes of winning the kickoff Iowa caucuses and the first primary — and finished second in both.
Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, who won the Iowa GOP caucuses last week, was running third in the Republican race in New Hampshire.
Among Republicans, McCain was winning 39 percent of the vote, Romney had 28 and Huckabee 12. Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani had 9 percent, Texas Rep. Ron Paul 8.
Clinton, the former first lady who finished third in Iowa, was mounting an unexpectedly stiff challenge to Obama in the nation’s first primary. Interviews with voters leaving their polling places showed she was winning handily among registered Democrats, while her rival led her by an even larger margin among independents.
With votes counted from 14 percent of the state’s precincts, she had 40 percent to 35 percent for Obama, who is seeking to become the nation’s first black president. Former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina trailed with 17 percent.
Clinton’s performance, based on the early returns, surprised even her own inner circle.
In the hours leading up to the poll closing, her closest advisers had appeared to be bracing for a second defeat at the hands of Obama.
Officials said her aides were considering whether to effectively concede the next two contests — caucuses in Nevada on Jan. 19 and a South Carolina primary a week later — and instead try to regroup in time for a 22-state round of contests on Feb. 5.
These officials also said a campaign shake-up was in the works, with longtime Clinton confidante Maggie Williams poised to come aboard to help sharpen the former first lady’s message. Other personnel additions are expected, according to these officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity while discussing strategy.
Obama, who won the leadoff Iowa caucuses last week, looked for an endorsement from the powerful Culinary Workers union in Nevada in the days ahead. South Carolina’s Democratic electorate is heavily black and likely to go for the most viable black presidential candidate in history.
The Republican race turns next to Michigan, where McCain and Romney already are advertising on television, and where both men planned appearances on Wednesday. Huckabee also was expected to campaign in the state.
By custom, the first handful of New Hampshire votes was cast, at midnight, in Dixville Notch in the far northern tip of the state.
By tradition, the first primary held the power to propel winners into the rush of primaries that follow — and to send the also-rans home for good.
And by registration, New Hampshire’s balance of power rested with its independent voters, more than 40 percent of the electorate, neither reliably Democratic nor Republican, with the power to settle either race, or both.
McCain, an Arizona senator, in particular, appealed for their support in the run-up to the primary. He battled Romney, the former governor of next-door Massachusetts, and to a lesser extent Mike Huckabee, the former Arkansas governor who won last week’s Iowa caucuses.
According to preliminary results of a survey of voters as they left their polling places, more independents cast ballots in the Democratic race than in the Republican contest. They accounted for four of every 10 Democratic votes and about a third of Republican ballots. The survey was conducted for The Associated Press and the television networks.
Republicans were split roughly evenly in naming the nation’s top issues: the economy, Iraq, illegal immigration and terrorism. Romney had a big lead among those naming immigration, while McCain led on the other issues.
Half of Republicans said illegal immigrants should be deported, and this group leaned toward Romney. Those saying illegal immigrants should be allowed to apply for citizenship leaned toward McCain, while the two candidates split those saying those here illegally should be allowed to stay as temporary workers.
Among Democrats, about one-third each named the economy and Iraq as the top issues facing the country, followed by health care. Voters naming the economy were split about evenly between Obama and Clinton, while Obama had an advantage among those naming the other two issues. Clinton has made health care a signature issue for years.
About one-third said if Bill Clinton were running, they would have voted for him on Tuesday.
“It has all the earmarks of a landslide with the Dixville Notch vote,” an upbeat McCain quipped — he got four votes there to Romney’s two and one for Giuliani — as his campaign bus headed to a polling place in Nashua. The crowd of supporters was so big, that voters complained and a poll worker pleaded with McCain to leave. Seconds later, the bus pulled away.
Former Tennessee Sen. Fred Thompson, Texas Rep. Paul and California Rep. Duncan Hunter completed the Republican field.
Obama, too, hoped independent voters would come his way, as they did last week in Iowa, where he won the first test of the campaign. Clinton, the New York senator and former first lady, ran third in Iowa. Former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina was second.
Obama drew huge crowds as he swept into New Hampshire, and as the front-runner drew plenty of criticism from Clinton and her husband. Asked if he expected more, Obama said, “Oh, I don’t think it will be just in the next few days. I think it’ll be, you know, until I’m the nominee or until I quit.” He said he understood their frustration.
Clinton, for her part, retooled her appeal to voters on the run. She lessened her emphasis on experience, and sought instead to raise questions about Obama’s ability to bring about the change he promised.
Win or lose, she said she was in the race to stay — never mind Edwards’ suggestion that the voters of Iowa had told her that her presence was no longer needed.
There was no letup in the television ad wars.
TNS Media Intelligence, a firm that tracks political advertising, said Clinton spent $5.4 million to reach New Hampshire voters, and Obama spent $5 million. The total for Edwards was $1.7 million, reflecting a smaller campaign treasury. New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, fourth candidate in the race, could afford about $500,000.
As happened in Iowa, Romney spent more than his rivals combined on television for the New Hampshire primary.
After losing Iowa, he could ill afford another defeat after basing his campaign strategy on victories in one or both states. Reflecting the stakes, he clashed in weekend debates with Huckabee over the Iraq war and with McCain over immigration as he tried to right his campaign.
On Tuesday, Romney put a positive face forward. “The Republicans will vote for me,” he said. “The independents will get behind me.”
McCain, too, was in need of a victory. Once the perceived front-runner, he suffered through a near-death political experience last year when his fundraising and support collapsed. He rallied, and by the final days of the New Hampshire race, held a celebration of sorts to mark his 100th town hall meeting in the state he won eight years ago.
___
David Espo reported from Washington. AP writers Liz Sidoti, Nedra Pickler, Scott Lindlaw, Glen Johnson, Beverley Wang, Charles Babington, Holly Ramer and Clarke Canfield contributed to this report.
Can't win in Iowa after spending millions and investing years. Same result in New Hampshire with equal effort. What's he gonna do when he gets to the good folks in the less "blue" areas of the country? Sounds like a one-say trip on the SS Minnow.  U.S. Army Retired |
Because some Freepers want him to. Don't confuse them with reality.
Dead serious, bucko. Romney is a more liberal-moderate more than anything. He is no conservative. And so far, all his money has won him nothing. I'm confident, Romney will not get the GOP nomination. This is far from over.
Btw, so far, outside of Wyoming, no delegates have chosen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.