Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TAdams8591

Mitt was shown as unelectable in Iowa. Deal with it. On top of the lying, and flip-flopping Mitt has done, he’s the victim of the anti-mormon-cult bigots....

He sealed his own fate, imo, when he decided he would adopt Obamas campaign strategy.

As Karl Rove says about Hillary, HE is a fatally flawed candidate.

He’s done, he CANNOT win.


2,715 posted on 01/08/2008 11:58:20 PM PST by Khepri (Fred Thompson, he's a hundred miles away son - READY TO STRIKE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1750 | View Replies ]


To: Khepri
ALL the candidates are flawed, hon. But Mitt has far more positives to offer than any of the others, the principle reason he has my support.

Mitt came in second in Iowa the state that in addition to voting for Huckabee, also voted for Pat Robertson. That hardly shows that Mitt's unelectable, and has nothing to do with electability. It tells us far more about the voters in Iowa than it does about Mitt. That you draw such a conclusion from the Iowa caucus is laughably absurd.

Mitt's in it for the long haul. He has more delegates than any other Republican in the race and remains a formidable candidate and THE ONE to beat. His two second and one place showing thus far, supersedes the winnings of all the potential R nominees.

Now YOU deal.

2,770 posted on 01/09/2008 5:30:26 AM PST by TAdams8591 ((Mitt Romney '08, THE ONLY candidate who can defeat Giuliani and Hillary and Obama!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2715 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson