Skip to comments.
When Ron Paul Lunatics Attack (Ron Paul Lunatics Attack Hannity)
fimc.net via Hannity.com ^
Posted on 01/07/2008 1:57:23 PM PST by mnehring
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600, 601-620, 621-640 ... 701-706 next last
To: NavyCanDo
Ron Paul supporters are a different lot all together. You have anarchist, you have 9/11 truthers, you have Bush haters, you have Air America listeners, you have anti-war activist, you have liberals, you Libertarians, and yes you even have conservatives that are not ashamed of associating with these others if it advances their cause of eliminating big government. A dangerous and deranged lot indeed. Hey Bush told a Christian Conservative leader to basically go away and the next day was meeting with Log Cabin Republicans. But I bet you still voted for Bush didn't ya? So is Bush queer? Does he support the gay agenda? Well he must afterall he met with them and shunned Christian Conservatives in 2000.
601
posted on
01/08/2008 9:22:35 AM PST
by
cva66snipe
(Proud Partisan Constitution Supporting Conservative to which I make no apologies for nor back down)
To: nicmarlo
Because hannity is a woos ;->
To: cva66snipe
"...Proud Partisan Constitution Supporting Conservative" LOL!
You Paultards make Joseph Goebbels look like a giant!
603
posted on
01/08/2008 9:25:38 AM PST
by
lormand
(Ron Paul 08' - Cult of the Insane)
To: mnehrling
To: SJackson
Watching the video, it's irrelevant whether anything was thrown, that was clearly a mob and Hannity had every reason to feel threatened.Do everyone a favor and don't participate in any freeps.
605
posted on
01/08/2008 9:29:59 AM PST
by
jmc813
(Don't screw this up, vote for Thompson.)
To: mnehrling
Jeeze you are sensitive, it (Huckabee comment) was a joke, and as I stated several times this entire thread was originally posted under politics/humor, not breaking news, Ive even asked it be moved back where I originally put it and it appears it was moved back.. Most Freepers would have stated JOKE by a few threads. BTW I'm not voting Huck myself. I see you are a Fred supporter. Fine by me to each his own. Paul is on my top two choices list. I disagree deeply on one issue with Paul but I also disagree with Fred and Bush on it as well as Rudy, Mitt, and John. That issue being National Defense. That is the reason Hunter has my ear as well.
606
posted on
01/08/2008 9:30:45 AM PST
by
cva66snipe
(Proud Partisan Constitution Supporting Conservative to which I make no apologies for nor back down)
To: nicmarlo
>>>He was so threatened,
he walked, not ran, into the building with a smile on his face with a
woman in close proximity
following behind him. Any
MAN who felt threatened would ensure that any
WOMAN standing near him would be
removed to safety first.<<<
I hope you don't mind me repeating this. Is this how Hannity treats all women? Does he make them walk behing him to cover his back when he is in danger??????????????????????Look how big he is hiding in front of the little women.
607
posted on
01/08/2008 9:31:07 AM PST
by
texastoo
((((((USA)))))((((((, USA))))))((((((. USA))))))))
To: lormand
You Paultards make Joseph Goebbels look like a giant! What is wrong with being politically partisan especially when based on Constitutional issues? Oh that's right W told ya it was just a #### piece of paper.
608
posted on
01/08/2008 9:33:53 AM PST
by
cva66snipe
(Proud Partisan Constitution Supporting Conservative to which I make no apologies for nor back down)
To: texastoo
Look how big he is hiding in front of the little women. And inside his studios....behind a screen. I just think it's more than a little odd. A real man, who's really feeling threatened and in danger, surely would not have women and children walk behind them while they themselves are out of the "line of fire"....unless there was, perhaps, no danger whatsoever.
To: mnehrling
Looked like a bunch of young punks for the most part. I bet Pauls real proud.
610
posted on
01/08/2008 9:36:36 AM PST
by
linn37
(phlebotomist on duty,its just a little pinch)
To: cva66snipe
The thread was not a joke, nor was it attack, I put it in humor because I didn't feel it warranted politics/elections, it was moved to breaking. I didn't realize re the Huckabee comment I had to dumb down that joke so you would understand, especially after your barney fief(sp?) comment.
I'll remember that for next time, you need special little tags to understand a post. //sarc
(//sarc means sarcasm- sar·casm [sahr-kaz-uhm] –noun 1. harsh or bitter derision or irony. 2. a sharply ironical taunt; sneering or cutting remark: a review full of sarcasms. )
To: mnehrling
Democrat thugs using Ron Paul as a cover. Nothing new. I’m not a big Hannity fan but that was clearly brownshirt behaviour. Maybe there is something to the Ron Paul/ Stormfront connection.
612
posted on
01/08/2008 9:41:21 AM PST
by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
To: nicmarlo
"....unless there was, perhaps, no danger whatsoever. It is either that or he is a coward letting a woman cover his back.
613
posted on
01/08/2008 9:42:11 AM PST
by
texastoo
((((((USA)))))((((((, USA))))))((((((. USA))))))))
To: texastoo
"....unless there was, perhaps, no danger whatsoever. It is either that or he is a coward letting a woman cover his back.
Exactly.
To: Liberty Valance
And just maybe he’s exaggerating and/or misrepresenting.
Gosh. Imagine that.
To: mnehrling
I didn't realize re the Huckabee comment I had to dumb down that joke so you would understand, especially after your barney fief(sp?) comment. It was a Gomer comment not Barney. Sheesh get it right. LOL Oh I forgot this wasn't a thread based on fact anyway so that doesn't matter...
616
posted on
01/08/2008 9:48:28 AM PST
by
cva66snipe
(Proud Partisan Constitution Supporting Conservative to which I make no apologies for nor back down)
To: mnehrling; cva66snipe
The thread was not a joke, nor was it attack, I put it in humor because I didn't feel it warranted politics/elections, it was moved to breaking.I can vouch for this. It was up for a half hour or so before getting moved.
617
posted on
01/08/2008 9:53:32 AM PST
by
jmc813
(Don't screw this up, vote for Thompson.)
To: nicmarlo
618
posted on
01/08/2008 10:08:20 AM PST
by
rb22982
To: jmc813
Well I might agree that it wasn't a joke but it was an attack article. A story based solely on internet discussion board forum accounts. Funny thing about the internet is any of us can claim to anybody that witnessed anything.
Now personally after seeing Hannity's hate for Ron Paul several times on TV I believe he would jump at any chance to smear his campaign. IOW what I am saying is this. IF this happened then why isn't Hannity himself running with the story? All Hannity has said about it is snowball.
And as for the language some say was used? Want to discuss Dick Cheney public comments anyone or even W's?
619
posted on
01/08/2008 10:09:45 AM PST
by
cva66snipe
(Proud Partisan Constitution Supporting Conservative to which I make no apologies for nor back down)
To: GovernmentIsTheProblem
Please watch the video again, and respond with either the minutes/seconds of one item being actually thrown, or one curse word.
After a quick review-
At :25, something, probably snow, is plainly seen flying through air. A moment later, someone close to the camera says something about snow being thrown.
At 1:06, "Hey stop throwing snow."
At 1:11, sounds like "piece of ****."
At 1:13, "He's Hitler's best friend."
At 1:17, "Sh*t"
At 1:27, the thing that should make any normal person realize that what was going on was vile, the woman with Hannity turns around and says something to the crowd, probably asking they back off, clearly upset.
If you can make out the crowd chanting anything more vile than fox news sucks (which it does), Ill say its rude and inappropriate.
There you go.
620
posted on
01/08/2008 10:09:58 AM PST
by
MitchellC
(FILL THE TANK ON FRED'S PICKUP - Fred08.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600, 601-620, 621-640 ... 701-706 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson