Thanks for that; I cut the cable cold turkey in 1990 and have never looked back. Talk radio, top-of-the-hour network radio news, and articles linked through this website are all but my only sources, anymore.
Seems Romney’s trying to invoke Federalism as a foil to save him from his pro-ENDA position syaing he’d NOT support Federal ENDA, but thinks it’d be a good thing for the 50 States to implement individually.
Well, that’s just a difference of methods, not a difference of substance. When you think 50 out of 50 States should implement XYZ, it isn’t much practical difference from having the FedGov implement XYZ; details might vary from State to State, but the overall result would be functionally the same.
Sorry, Mitt. The Skeleton is still there. FLUSH!!!
The difference between what Romney said and a pro-federalist position is that Romney suggests he SUPPORTED the legislation being approved at the state level....exactly what he did in Mass.