Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: longtermmemmory
"those cites indicate a refusal has a specific consequence, not a refusal allows for a forced insertion of a needle in the body."

That's correct. the TX statutes only allow for a forced draw in the event the driver was involved in an accident resulting in death. So, I find the the initial story screwy, or it means the particular chiefs are acting on their own, w/o legal justification.

"however “a specimin” language leaves void for vaugness issues."Nah, the definitions in the statutes and the total of the statutes makes everything clear.

294 posted on 12/28/2007 10:47:59 PM PST by spunkets ("Freedom is about authority", Rudy Giuliani, gun grabber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies ]


To: spunkets

based on what you are saying it seems we are subjects of journalistic malpractice in the reporting of this.

(still would have fun with the “a specimin” in a motion to surpress...then again it depends on the type of “a specimin” and the beauty of the female officer provided...)


298 posted on 12/28/2007 10:54:48 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson