To: spunkets
based on what you are saying it seems we are subjects of journalistic malpractice in the reporting of this.
(still would have fun with the “a specimin” in a motion to surpress...then again it depends on the type of “a specimin” and the beauty of the female officer provided...)
298 posted on
12/28/2007 10:54:48 PM PST by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: longtermmemmory
It isn’t sheriffs or police chiefs doing this on their own. Individual counties are changing the law within their counties to say you can’t refuse a blood test.
I don’t know how it will stand up in a state court. I’m not familiar enough with the relevant portions of the state constitution to say that they can’t do it at the county or city level. I would hope they can’t.
300 posted on
12/28/2007 11:00:54 PM PST by
mouse_35
(Vote Demorcrat for 2008! Lets do for Iraq what we did for Cambodia!!!)
To: longtermmemmory
302 posted on
12/28/2007 11:05:07 PM PST by
spunkets
("Freedom is about authority", Rudy Giuliani, gun grabber)
To: longtermmemmory
Apparently the cops and prosecutors are just getting search warrants.
HArris Co DA306 posted on
12/28/2007 11:33:54 PM PST by
spunkets
("Freedom is about authority", Rudy Giuliani, gun grabber)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson