Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nanotechnology yields a breakthrough in battery life
Nanotechwire ^ | 12/27/2007 | Staff

Posted on 12/27/2007 11:43:25 PM PST by PeaceBeWithYou

Stanford researchers have found a way to use silicon nanowires to reinvent the rechargeable lithium-ion batteries that power laptops, iPods, video cameras, cell phones, and countless other devices.

The new version, developed through research led by Yi Cui, assistant professor of materials science and engineering, produces 10 times the amount of electricity of existing lithium-ion, known as Li-ion, batteries. A laptop that now runs on battery for two hours could operate for 20 hours, a boon to ocean-hopping business travelers.

"It's not a small improvement," Cui said. "It's a revolutionary development."

The breakthrough is described in a paper, "High-performance lithium battery anodes using silicon nanowires," published online Dec. 16 in Nature Nanotechnology, written by Cui, his graduate chemistry student Candace Chan and five others.

The greatly expanded storage capacity could make Li-ion batteries attractive to electric car manufacturers. Cui suggested that they could also be used in homes or offices to store electricity generated by rooftop solar panels.

"Given the mature infrastructure behind silicon, this new technology can be pushed to real life quickly," Cui said.

The electrical storage capacity of a Li-ion battery is limited by how much lithium can be held in the battery's anode, which is typically made of carbon. Silicon has a much higher capacity than carbon, but also has a drawback.

Silicon placed in a battery swells as it absorbs positively charged lithium atoms during charging, then shrinks during use (i.e., when playing your iPod) as the lithium is drawn out of the silicon. This expand/shrink cycle typically causes the silicon (often in the form of particles or a thin film) to pulverize, degrading the performance of the battery.

Cui's battery gets around this problem with nanotechnology. The lithium is stored in a forest of tiny silicon nanowires, each with a diameter one-thousandth the thickness of a sheet of paper. The nanowires inflate four times their normal size as they soak up lithium. But, unlike other silicon shapes, they do not fracture.

Research on silicon in batteries began three decades ago. Chan explained: "The people kind of gave up on it because the capacity wasn't high enough and the cycle life wasn't good enough. And it was just because of the shape they were using. It was just too big, and they couldn't undergo the volume changes."

Then, along came silicon nanowires. "We just kind of put them together," Chan said.

For their experiments, Chan grew the nanowires on a stainless steel substrate, providing an excellent electrical connection. "It was a fantastic moment when Candace told me it was working," Cui said.

Cui said that a patent application has been filed. He is considering formation of a company or an agreement with a battery manufacturer. Manufacturing the nanowire batteries would require "one or two different steps, but the process can certainly be scaled up," he added. "It's a well understood process."

Also contributing to the paper in Nature Nanotechnology were Halin Peng and Robert A. Huggins of Materials Science and Engineering at Stanford, Gao Liu of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, and Kevin McIlwrath and Xiao Feng Zhang of the electron microscope division of Hitachi High Technologies in Pleasanton, Calif.



TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: battery; breakthrough; energy; lithium; nanotech
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 12/27/2007 11:43:32 PM PST by PeaceBeWithYou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

Cool post. Thanks.


2 posted on 12/27/2007 11:45:46 PM PST by Maelstorm (The first commandment of God "be ye fruitful, and multiply..")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

those Asians......


3 posted on 12/27/2007 11:53:59 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

Most excellent.

Technology marches onward.


4 posted on 12/28/2007 12:07:33 AM PST by Ronin (Bushed out!!! Another tragic victim of BDS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

I hate to be a gloomy Gus...But in a way I hate reading stories about breakthroughs like this, because it seems to take forever before they hit the production lines.

I’ve been watching and waiting for several to actually jhit the market at a decent price point. If they ever come to market ar all. Still lookin for my 25’ roll-up OLED TV screen for years and years now. and haven’t seen anyone marketing electric and heat co-generator home systems that run off of the natural gas line...Yep! It’s proven tech...you can get heat, cookinf=g and Electricity from one very efficient and inexpensive appliance hooked to your gas line.

OLED TVs too. They’re putting out that dinky 10” screen for 2K...one of OLEDs major factors for replacing LCDs, is they are actually MUCH CHEAPER to make!

Well, amybe I’ll still be alive to see these batteries in the supermarket...but I doubt it.

(DGHoodini steps down from his soapbox.)


5 posted on 12/28/2007 12:14:18 AM PST by DGHoodini (The Dems no longer have the humanity to grasp that there are things worth dying for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DGHoodini

CORRECTION: that was supposed to read: 25” roll-up OLED TV.


6 posted on 12/28/2007 12:20:00 AM PST by DGHoodini (The Dems no longer have the humanity to grasp that there are things worth dying for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

It’s amazing what science comes up with. Battery technology is important, but there are limited supplies of lithium available.


7 posted on 12/28/2007 12:29:47 AM PST by Albert Guérisse (chemist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

Way cool.


8 posted on 12/28/2007 12:35:47 AM PST by dadgum (Jesus, The Christ, will return soon. Are you ready?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DGHoodini

I am still waiting for my personal jetpack and hovercar.


9 posted on 12/28/2007 12:45:19 AM PST by LukeL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Albert Guérisse

Between Gore & Paul, they should be able to spare enough.


10 posted on 12/28/2007 1:31:32 AM PST by DGHoodini (The Dems no longer have the humanity to grasp that there are things worth dying for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LukeL

I hear ya, Brudda! ;o)


11 posted on 12/28/2007 1:32:32 AM PST by DGHoodini (The Dems no longer have the humanity to grasp that there are things worth dying for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

Maybe this will shut up the crowd thats been boo-hooing the electric car.

This makes really some good news, everyone has had the mindset that batteries will always be big, bulky and expensive, not so! Battery technology is advancing faster than computer CPU speed was in the mid 90’s.


12 posted on 12/28/2007 1:37:16 AM PST by Eye of Unk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

If this is true 20X the energy density of existing Lithium Ion batteries, then this should put electric vehicle’s in showrooms.

Ironically, the liberals will be really ticked, since we will all be able to still drive Hummers.


13 posted on 12/28/2007 1:49:17 AM PST by NavVet (If you don't defend conservatism in the Primary, you won't have it to defend in the Election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

Lithium ion battery ping


14 posted on 12/28/2007 3:31:48 AM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

bttt


15 posted on 12/28/2007 3:33:16 AM PST by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan

bump


16 posted on 12/28/2007 4:18:46 AM PST by Normandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk
Maybe this will shut up the crowd thats been boo-hooing the electric car.

The Tesla Roadster concept is pretty well supported here. I like full size sedans (Electra, Olds 98, Imperial, Town Car), which will probably be the last recipients of electric technology, but if this technology can increase the range of the Tesla five fold, then itis completely viable ON ITS OWN TERMS, that is irrespective of whether it cuts pollution or reduces oil dependency. That is the key to success.

I do wonder how long it would take to recharge the nano-li-ion Tesla with a range of 800 miles.
17 posted on 12/28/2007 4:48:34 AM PST by Dr. Sivana (Not a newbie, I just wanted a new screen name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Albert Guérisse
"It’s amazing what science comes up with. Battery technology is important, but there are limited supplies of lithium available."

Not true-there is more lithium around than we'll ever need. And, just like lead in batteries currently, it will mostly be recycled.

18 posted on 12/28/2007 5:07:08 AM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel-NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana
That is the key to success.

You also have to add in the usable life of the batteries, too. If you're going to have to spend $15K in 5-8 years to replace them, there isn't much advantage.

We'll be seeing truly competitive, viable electric commuter cars within about 5 years, though....and the 0-60 mph performance will be "blistering".......

19 posted on 12/28/2007 5:19:30 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Debates? Those weren't no stinkin' debates!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DGHoodini
I hate to be a gloomy Gus...But in a way I hate reading stories about breakthroughs like this, because it seems to take forever before they hit the production lines.

Usually they never hit the production line, because there is some major drawback that is never mentioned in the press releases.

20 posted on 12/28/2007 5:29:40 AM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson