“Nice try at redefining the issue, but it won’t work. Read my first post on this thread, #67. The issue for me isn’t the cross/bookcase, it’s the denial.”
lol you make up an issue out of thin air *based on people mistaking a bookcase for a cross* and then ignore the foundation of your whole argument..
I don’t think anyone “mistook” the bookcase for a cross. Yes, it’s clearly a bookcase. But it’s a bookcase deliberately framed and highlighted to appear like a floating glowing cross panning slowly across the film.
It appears obviously contrived to me. Which isn’t a problem. It’s his lying about it so as to appear a hapless victim of an overzealous press that totally turns me off.
He’s basically trying to create a “war on Christmas” controversy by sticking this in there, and then claiming that all the people who obviously see it are paranoid and delusional and out to take the Christ out of Christmas. I personally consider the -real- issue too important to condone seeing it manipulated for rank political gain like this, and hell, I’m agnostic.
Qwinn