To: GATOR NAVY; sitetest; Petronski
108 posted on
12/20/2007 9:04:47 AM PST by
perfect_rovian_storm
(John Cox 2008: Because Duncan Hunter just isn't obscure enough for me!)
To: Brices Crossroads
Ping to 108. If this is as big as it sounds, it would really shake things up a lot.
116 posted on
12/20/2007 9:14:16 AM PST by
perfect_rovian_storm
(John Cox 2008: Because Duncan Hunter just isn't obscure enough for me!)
To: perfect_rovian_storm
Sounds familiar. It’s about a ‘sitting senator’ and leading presidential candidate sex scandal. I'm on the same page as you. IIRC, the original story about the supposed sex scandal also claimed that journalists were sitting on the story out of ethical concerns about publishing it during an election. Same as this story. I've been wondering when/if we'd ever find out what that original story was about. Maybe we're about to.
131 posted on
12/20/2007 9:55:44 AM PST by
lonevoice
(It's always "Apologize to a Muslim Hour"...somewhere)
To: perfect_rovian_storm
Um, no. I believe it's been pretty much established that the
L.A. Times story was the one involving Hillary! and Huma, which still hasn't seen the light of day.
This one sounds more like an influence-peddling issue, not a sex scandal.
151 posted on
12/20/2007 10:38:19 AM PST by
JennysCool
(Merry Christmas!)
To: perfect_rovian_storm
Rove you magnificent basterd!
152 posted on
12/20/2007 10:41:16 AM PST by
omega4179
(Bring me the broomstick of the wicked witch of the west.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson