[JennysCool]

Um, no. I believe it's been pretty much established that the L.A. Times story was the one involving Hillary! and Huma, which still hasn't seen the light of day.

This one sounds more like an influence-peddling issue, not a sex scandal.

[perfect_rovian_storm]

Um, okay. Except that isn’t really fully ‘established’. Just rumored. Secondly, if you read what Drudge says carefully, you’ll note the apprehension about publishing the story, as well as the curious fact that the lobbyist has also strongly denied any special treatment, which says to me that it’s really related to something else other than influence peddling.

It’s all speculation of course, but so is the stuff about it being Hillary. The two stories do seem to match up to me.