Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GovernmentIsTheProblem

They where allowed to live on this land as part of a treaty. If there is no longer a treaty then they are not entitled to the land.


43 posted on 12/20/2007 6:03:55 AM PST by WWTraveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: WWTraveler

You absolutely have no idea what you are talking about. But, have a nice day.


166 posted on 12/20/2007 9:09:55 AM PST by fish hawk (The religion of Darwinism = Monkey Intellect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: WWTraveler
"They where allowed to live on this land as part of a treaty. If there is no longer a treaty then they are not entitled to the land. "

Some might say that we where (sic) allowed to live on this land as part of a treaty. If there is no longer a treaty then we are not entitled to the land. Realistically, if this is or becomes a genuine legal effort, it might get really interesting in court.

174 posted on 12/20/2007 9:22:35 AM PST by matthew fuller (The destruction of the CIA tapes was indubitably intentional obstruction of treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson