Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is India Bad for Jaguar?
TIME ^ | Friday, Dec. 14, 2007 | SIMON ROBINSON

Posted on 12/20/2007 3:56:27 AM PST by samsonite

India likes to trumpet its corporate successes, and this week the emerging global power had plenty to shout about with the appointment of Indian-born Vikram Pandit to head troubled financial giant Citigroup. But even as it celebrated, India Inc. was also up in arms over perceived slights to its ability to run two of the world's most prestigious brands.

India's currency comes of age, spurring complaints among exporters and bringing cheer to wealthy globetrotters

First, a group of U.S. Jaguar dealers said they opposed the possibility that Ford, Jaguar's owner, might sell the British luxury car brand to an Indian firm. Two of the three firms that Ford has shortlisted as potential purchasers are Indian: Mahindra & Mahindra and Tata Motors. The dealers said that the sale to an Indian company would hurt Jaguar's image. "I don't believe the U.S. public is ready for ownership out of India of a luxury car make," Ken Gorin, chairman of the Jaguar Business Operations Council, told the Wall Street Journal. "And I believe it would severely throw a tremendous cast of doubt over the viability of the brand."

(Excerpt) Read more at time.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: automakers; business; fordmotor; globalization; india; jaguar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: xsrdx

Er,..a very expensive Ford Taurus..


21 posted on 12/20/2007 6:47:42 AM PST by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ken5050; TC Rider
Er,..a very expensive Ford Taurus..

Tough crowd!

I'd buy an M6 or GT3 long before I'd consider a high end Jaguar or even a Vantage, but I still think they look better than a Taurus..

Of course, if I brought a GT3 home I'd be sleeping on the couch for the next year.

22 posted on 12/20/2007 7:59:06 AM PST by xsrdx (Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: xsrdx

You’re right. The Taurus’ mirrors are better looking.


23 posted on 12/20/2007 8:01:27 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (ENERGY CRISIS made in Washington D. C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: xsrdx

Or you could sleep in the GT3...


24 posted on 12/20/2007 8:02:18 AM PST by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: xsrdx

Given a choice, I’ll take the Aston, thank you.


25 posted on 12/20/2007 8:21:11 AM PST by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: doodad

That is how the aussie’s pronounce it.


26 posted on 12/20/2007 8:23:03 AM PST by Boiler Plate ("Message received, is message sent" Claire Cooper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: duckman

How about a Bengal tiger for a hood ornament?

India produces locomotives, weapons systems, fighter jets, and nuclear bombs.

They ought to be able to handle a sports car.


27 posted on 12/20/2007 11:42:47 AM PST by elcid1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: samsonite

The car’s computer will be programmed to run the vehicle off the road if it is in danger of hitting animals not smart enough to get out of the way.


28 posted on 12/20/2007 2:45:43 PM PST by PsyOp (Truth in itself is rarely sufficient to make men act. - Clauswitz, On War, 1832.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samsonite

Remember the Jerry Seinfeld episode where the sweat from the car parker totally permeated the interior???

Maybe the new Jag will come with a new “new car” smell!


29 posted on 12/20/2007 2:53:09 PM PST by aShepard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samsonite

is India bad for Jaguar ?

....gonna have to ‘splain the red dot on the grill , no ?

I’m just sayin’


30 posted on 12/20/2007 2:54:58 PM PST by advertising guy (If computer skills namedo us, I'd be back-space delete.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

Introducing the new Bodacious Tata...

(Sorry.)

31 posted on 12/20/2007 3:33:26 PM PST by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: samsonite
I have no idea but it isn’t doing Dell any good. Have your Dell go nuts and then you will go nuts trying to get the guy on the helpline to talk enough English for you to get some help.
32 posted on 12/20/2007 3:48:58 PM PST by fish hawk (The religion of Darwinism = Monkey Intellect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

1) About Citi being headed by an Indian and outsourcing going on steroids: Citi is in deep sh*t thanks to the sub-crime. The board gave the CEO job to the person who the board thought was best capable of getting the job done in holding the company together. This person happens to be Indian and yes, if outsourcing cuts costs, outsourcing will go on steroids. Too bad for all the lazy no good IT folk in the company who just sat on their backsides and took their bonuses home, life just got difficult. Live with it.

2) About Tata buying the Jaguar from Ford: Exactly what does Ford produce today that can even be called “luxury”. Also, I think the Tatas are better off financially than the Fords right now and will probably be able to spend more on R&D and new designs than Ford can afford. Part of the reason why Ford wants to sell, no? Yes indeed, Ford can sell it to a “Smythe” or a “Rockerfeller” if they are indeed interested to buy, but Ford will sell Jaguar to whoever offers better return to Ford. If consumers don’t like the idea, they can buy Porsches or Astons or Landwinds for all Ford and Tata care. If the employees of Jaguar are unhappy, they are probably as able to join other companies as you and I are. No one is bound by slave contracts.

As for the whiners on this board, there’s obviously a lot more of these deals that will surface over the coming years. Quit whining and get used to it.


33 posted on 12/20/2007 6:40:01 PM PST by MimirsWell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Sender

Nice picture. And, the front drum brake is a nice retro touch - not much good for stopping but looks nice nevertheless. I wonder if it has electric start or if another retro touch is kick starting.


34 posted on 12/22/2007 6:31:26 AM PST by snoringbear (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: snoringbear
They have both electric and kick start; you can special order one with kick start only and only a 4-speed trans, which is some kind of requirement for vintage racing.

The Royal Enfield doesn't have much horsepower or braking power. However I would still like to own one. It's like a time machine. Around $5K.

35 posted on 12/22/2007 11:41:20 AM PST by Sender (You are the weapon. What you hold in your hand is just a tool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: CatoRenasci
If it goes Indian, there’ll be no gain in cachet and we’ll get even less than British reliability

And all the dealers know that. That's why they said what they said. It must be hard enough as it is to sell them without having to counter an image of being a Calcutta Slums car.

36 posted on 12/22/2007 11:47:54 AM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson