Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Richard Poe
If God did not want us to ponder this subject, on some level, surely he would not have filled the Holy Scriptures with so many references to it.

I see what you are saying, but the genealogy given stopped with Christ. It was provided to validate his lineage.

If God wanted us to ponder genealogy beyond the birth of our Savior, He would have provided additional information.....

44 posted on 12/20/2007 2:39:13 AM PST by Gamecock (Aaron had what every megachurch pastor craves: a huge crowd that gave freely and lively worship.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Gamecock

>>If God wanted us to ponder genealogy beyond the birth of our Savior, He would have provided additional information.....<<

Well said, thank you.

It’s along the same lines as those who salivate over the news to find connections to the Jenkins/LaHaye version of eschatology. There’s a certain mystical nature to it that appeals to our fleshly need to figure out a good mystery. It appeals to sinful desires, and ultimately profits nothing.


50 posted on 12/20/2007 5:36:36 AM PST by ItsOurTimeNow (Classic Blunder #1 - "Never get involved in a land war in Asia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Gamecock
Gamecock writes: If God wanted us to ponder genealogy beyond the birth of our Savior, He would have provided additional information...

Well, we have the names of a dozen-odd relatives of Jesus who survived his crucifixion, several of whom became prominent in the Church, and at least two of whom apparently contributed books to the New Testament (James and Jude).

Surely that qualifies as "additional information".

54 posted on 12/20/2007 5:57:13 AM PST by Richard Poe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson