Ron Paul would let North Korea invade South Korea, China invade Taiwan and would have let Saddam have his way after the invasion of Kuwait.
1 posted on
12/19/2007 5:34:27 AM PST by
50mm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
To: lormand; 50mm
2 posted on
12/19/2007 5:35:40 AM PST by
50mm
(Where's CableNewsJunkie3?)
To: 50mm
Very few paulbots will defend him on this issue...
3 posted on
12/19/2007 5:36:37 AM PST by
darkwing104
(Lets get dangerous)
To: 50mm
Ron Paul on War
Ron Paul, What War?
5 posted on
12/19/2007 5:38:39 AM PST by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! Duncan Hunter is a Cosponsor.)
To: 50mm
This life long Republican would cross over and vote for another candidate if Ron Paul ever got the nomination. But he wont. He is as nutty as a Christmas fruit cake. And extremely dangerous if he ever got in office.
7 posted on
12/19/2007 5:39:44 AM PST by
Bulldawg Fan
(Victory is the last thing Murtha and his fellow Defeatists want.)
To: 50mm
Ron Paul say: “The radicals were able to use our bases in Saudi Arabia and the bombing of Iraq (from 1991 to 2001) as a reason to come over here.”
I think Ron Paul drafted Bin Laden’s 11/2001 letter to America because that is precisely the excuse Bin Laden used for his attacks on us; our troops were in the Arabian Peninsula, forget the fact we were INVITED there.
8 posted on
12/19/2007 5:40:28 AM PST by
HD1200
To: 50mm
And what are Paul’s numbers in IA and NH? There’s no way he can win the Republican nomination. The only way he could get on the ballot in November would be as Losertarian, but he’d still mostly draw votes away from the DemocRAT nominee the way Anderson did in 1980.
To: 50mm
“The first Iraq war? Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait. He might have invaded the next country, and the next.
I bet Israel would have done something about it, and I bet Saudi Arabia maybe would have talked to Israel. I think if it would have been left to the region, they might have taken care of Saddam Hussein in 1990 and we wouldn’t have the problems we have today.”
If left to the region, Saddam might’ve also controlled the entire Middle East oil supply, Ron. What a dork.
To: 50mm
So in World War II, we were justified? Sure.
Why? Germany didn't attack us.
Well, they sank some of our freighters but we could have just talked to them about that, I suppose.
11 posted on
12/19/2007 5:45:07 AM PST by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: 50mm
How many of the founding fathers would agree with Ron Paul?
12 posted on
12/19/2007 5:46:59 AM PST by
PjhCPA
(catchy tag lines are boring)
To: 50mm
Lol. He’s right, Montana could handle it.
If Canada invades Montana?
I think that might be a little bit different. Montana probably could take care of it, but we’d probably help them out from Washington if that happened.
14 posted on
12/19/2007 5:48:25 AM PST by
BGHater
(If Guns Cause Crime Then Matches Cause Arson?)
To: 50mm
"Many say the surge in Iraq is succeeding, that we're at a turning point now, and we are creating a model of democracy in a part of the world that hasn't seen that."
"That's the propaganda. I don't happen to believe that."
Heh Ron Paul, screw you you little pathetic man. You have to be a liar and a fool to deny we are winning in Iraq. It is obvious you are!
17 posted on
12/19/2007 5:51:41 AM PST by
jrooney
(Ron Paul makes Jimmy Carter look tough and Dennis Kucinich look sane.)
To: 50mm
This conservative will not vote or will consider a Democrat candidate in the Presidential if that kook gets the GOP nod. He is a dream come true for the Democrats.
To: 50mm
I don’t see any real difference betwen Ron Paul’s view on the war, and the Democrats.
20 posted on
12/19/2007 5:53:36 AM PST by
Badeye
(No thanks, Huck, I'm not whitewashing the fence for you this election cycle)
To: 50mm
Ron Paul on War: “War is bad, mmm-kay? If you do war, your’re bad. Because war is bad. Mmm-kay?”
23 posted on
12/19/2007 5:59:11 AM PST by
flowerplough
("These go to eleven." -- Nigel Tufnel)
To: 50mm
If China were to do the same thing to us, and they had troops in our land, We would resent it. We'd probably do some shooting.The US presence in Saudi Arabia was at the invitation of the Saudi government to protect the Saudi people from the Baathist invasion that had already claimed the neighboring country of Kuwait.
The only reason why Chinese troops would ever be stationed on US soil would be because China was invading us.
Ron Paul is clinically insane.
26 posted on
12/19/2007 6:00:43 AM PST by
wideawake
(Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
To: 50mm
"And if in most of Iraq, some religious fanatic comes to power and has money to buy nuclear weapons, we should just leave him alone?"
Talk to them and ask them pretty please not to set it off and kill our innocent civilians? The same guys that behead children and women? The same guys that slaughter anyone for power? Yeah that is going to work Paul. You are a dangerous stupid man and your supporters are no better.
28 posted on
12/19/2007 6:02:36 AM PST by
jrooney
(Ron Paul makes Jimmy Carter look tough and Dennis Kucinich look sane.)
To: 50mm
This Ass thinks he is a constitutionalist? This creep doesnt know squat about the US Constitution.
This guy’s a loser..and those who support him are losers also.
30 posted on
12/19/2007 6:03:39 AM PST by
crz
To: 50mm
Ron Paul, the right man for the right time.
If the right time is 1901.
33 posted on
12/19/2007 6:08:44 AM PST by
mkjessup
(Hunter-Bolton '08 !! Patriots who will settle for nothing less than *Victory* in the War on Terror!)
To: 50mm
Under the Constitution, we don't have the authority to just put troops in foreign countries willy-nilly when we're not at war. Ron Paul, once again, drives my tagline home.
Under the actual Constitution of the United States, the Commander In Chief is entitled to deploy troops anywhere outside the United States he desires for any reason.
He has complete executive authority over US armed forces in both wartime and peacetime.
34 posted on
12/19/2007 6:08:52 AM PST by
wideawake
(Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
To: 50mm
I don't think that's true. It is not Muslim fanaticism that is the culprit. Ron, wake up and smell the jihad. You are completely, 100% wrong on this one.
36 posted on
12/19/2007 6:10:39 AM PST by
Dead Corpse
(What would a free man do?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson