XVI. THE CONSPIRACY TO RETALIATE AGAINST PLAINTIFFS AND THEIR TEAMMATES FOR EXERCISING THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS....
F. The Duke University Faculty’s Public Acts
Duke University is named as one of the defendant's and section 16, para F specifically mentions the acts of the faculty. The issue isn't really whether this suit includes the professors (it does as demonstrated above,) but it is about my original post #172. You'll probably not notice that in it I say I have no sympathy for either the players or the liberals. I conclude by saying I wish we could see all parties for stupidity.
"Carry Water?" If saying that I have no sympathy for those whose stupid act brought consequences, then I guess that's carrying water. And especially if I refer to both the liberal faculty and the players as stupid.
Do you have any evidence that the nurse DID see such signs - yes or no?
Yes. Her report. Your link even provided a review of her reports. Also, the case included testimony that the woman had DNA from a variety of partners and there was even testimony of a sex toy used. I don't find it surprising at all that that nurse found evidence of sex. In fact, since that was the charge of the players' lawyers -- multiple sex partners prior to the strip act at the players' party -- then I would hope that the nurse had noticed signs of sex.
I don't admit to enabling racist, left-wing corruption. Neither did P-Marlowe.
From your #308: Why are refusing to back up your claim that the peripheral players in the suit believed the accuser?
Peripheral players was my claim? Defendants was my claim?
My claim is at #172. Go read it.
You flat out said in #172 that you had no sympathy for the lawsuit and didn't care whether they won or lost. Now that is music to the ears of the corrupt at Duke & Durham. The laxers have already exposed and punished. Not so for the defendants.
They have yet to be held accountable, and you have been trashing what will probably be the only opportunity to expose and punish their wrongdoing. That, my friend, is carrying their water.
I don't find it surprising at all that that nurse found evidence of sex.
You said unusual sex. In any event, the NC AG himself said there was no objective evidence to support the accuser. And this nurse was to be Nifong's key medical witness.
I don't admit to enabling racist, left-wing corruption. Neither did P-Marlowe.
Sure he did:
ME: So you're willing to trash an effort to expose and punish wrongful actions on the part of Duke and Durham because YOU think Americans are sue happy, and that these guys are greedy little bastards.
P-M: Yep.
Furthermore, he accepted the principle by saying I would be helping to enable the laxers' wrongful acts by trashing his efforts to expose and punish. He would be correct - IF they had they not already been exposed and punished beyond what is reasonable.
Peripheral players was my claim? Defendants was my claim?
These were your words: If you take the risk, and you get burned, then I don't care if you win a lawsuit against peripheral folks.