You flat out said in #172 that you had no sympathy for the lawsuit and didn't care whether they won or lost. Now that is music to the ears of the corrupt at Duke & Durham. The laxers have already exposed and punished. Not so for the defendants.
They have yet to be held accountable, and you have been trashing what will probably be the only opportunity to expose and punish their wrongdoing. That, my friend, is carrying their water.
I don't find it surprising at all that that nurse found evidence of sex.
You said unusual sex. In any event, the NC AG himself said there was no objective evidence to support the accuser. And this nurse was to be Nifong's key medical witness.
I don't admit to enabling racist, left-wing corruption. Neither did P-Marlowe.
Sure he did:
ME: So you're willing to trash an effort to expose and punish wrongful actions on the part of Duke and Durham because YOU think Americans are sue happy, and that these guys are greedy little bastards.
P-M: Yep.
Furthermore, he accepted the principle by saying I would be helping to enable the laxers' wrongful acts by trashing his efforts to expose and punish. He would be correct - IF they had they not already been exposed and punished beyond what is reasonable.
Peripheral players was my claim? Defendants was my claim?
These were your words: If you take the risk, and you get burned, then I don't care if you win a lawsuit against peripheral folks.
Liar.
Are you a lunatic or are you just obsessed with making sure everyone agrees with you.
So, you agree my word was “peripheral.” Good. I actually remember using that word. That would include the 88 who took out the full page ad. That ad is mentioned in the lawsuit.
I have no sympathy for either side and couldn’t care less if the players win or lose, BECAUSE, as you have agreed, their own dumb act was the precipitating cause of the lawsuit.
You owe me an apology for calling me a liar. The peripheral players are mentioned in the lawsuit.
The sex toy constitutes unusual sex.
(P-M, see the following:)
FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION: FALSE PUBLIC STATEMENTS IN VIOLATION OF 42 U.S.C. §1983
(Against Addison, Nifong, Hodge, Wilson, the City of Durham, Meehan, Clark, DNASI, Levicy, Arico, Dzau, DUHS, Steel, Brodhead, Burness, and Duke University, in their individual capacities)Para (5): (e) The faculty-sponsored, full page advertisement encouraging and even thanking those who presumed guilt “for not waiting” to express their outrage publicly.
Since the Duke 88 professors sponsored that full-page ad (see Readers Digest.com), and since Cause of Action #4 references Duke University in their individual capacities, then it would be fair to say that the peripheral players are, at least, peripherally involved, wouldn't it?