“I hope one of those surprises is spelled N. R. A.”
Me too! I wonder why the NRA would not endorse during the primary? We certainly know they would endorse “whomever” the Republican nominee is against any DEM nominee. What we need is to see their endorsement NOW among the Republican candidates...BEFORE JAN.3rd! GO FRED!
No, the NRA didn’t endorse anyone in 92 or 96. There wasn’t a Republican nominee they could support. As you know, we lost.
The NRA would NEVER endorse Romney or Rooty, ever!
They would lose half their membership in one day.
That is the reason they cited that they may have to endorse a candidate in the primary season. They know that we could get stuck with an anti-gun nominee, and we would lose.
No Republican can win a national election ( POTUS ) without gun-issue voters and NRA support.
Before the RATS went nuts and adopted an anti-gun agenda they had a lock on the south and much of the midwest.
It wasn’t that long ago.
The “Reagan Democrats” was a term that was used for the Michigan/ Midwest union voters that switched over to Republican. The gun issue was the largest reason for that.
Huge chunks of swing voters decide based on that single issue, gun rights. Anti-gun Republicans can’t win.
Rooty and Romney supporters can cry and whine, stamp their little feet, until they are blue in the face but it wont change that FACT!