Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is a New Solar Cycle Beginning?
www.physorg.com ^ | 12/17/2007 | by Dr. Tony Phillips, Science@NASA

Posted on 12/18/2007 5:40:18 AM PST by Red Badger

The solar physics community is abuzz this week. No, there haven't been any great eruptions or solar storms. The source of the excitement is a modest knot of magnetism that popped over the sun's eastern limb on Dec. 11th, pictured below in a pair of images from the orbiting Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO).

From SOHO, a UV-wavelength image of the sun and a map showing positive (white) and negative (black) magnetic polarities. The new high-latitude active region is magnetically reversed, marking it as a harbinger of a new solar cycle.

It may not look like much, but "this patch of magnetism could be a sign of the next solar cycle," says solar physicist David Hathaway of the Marshall Space Flight Center.

For more than a year, the sun has been experiencing a lull in activity, marking the end of Solar Cycle 23, which peaked with many furious storms in 2000--2003. "Solar minimum is upon us," he says.

The big question now is, when will the next solar cycle begin?

It could be starting now.

"New solar cycles always begin with a high-latitude, reversed polarity sunspot," explains Hathaway. "Reversed polarity " means a sunspot with opposite magnetic polarity compared to sunspots from the previous solar cycle. "High-latitude" refers to the sun's grid of latitude and longitude. Old cycle spots congregate near the sun's equator. New cycle spots appear higher, around 25 or 30 degrees latitude

The region that appeared on Dec. 11th fits both these criteria. It is high latitude (24 degrees N) and magnetically reversed. Just one problem: There is no sunspot. So far the region is just a bright knot of magnetic fields. If, however, these fields coalesce into a dark sunspot, scientists are ready to announce that Solar Cycle 24 has officially begun.

Many forecasters believe Solar Cycle 24 will be big and intense. Peaking in 2011 or 2012, the cycle to come could have significant impacts on telecommunications, air traffic, power grids and GPS systems. (And don't forget the Northern Lights!) In this age of satellites and cell phones, the next solar cycle could make itself felt as never before.

The furious storms won't start right away, however. Solar cycles usually take a few years to build to a frenzy and Cycle 24 will be no exception. "We still have some quiet times ahead," says Hathaway.

Meanwhile, all eyes are on a promising little active region. Will it become the first sunspot of a new solar cycle?


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agw; catastrophism; energy; globalwarming; gw; space; sun
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last
Just in time for Christmas.................
1 posted on 12/18/2007 5:40:20 AM PST by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Just in time for 2012.


2 posted on 12/18/2007 5:41:31 AM PST by Perdogg (Fred Thompson for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Next Solar Max == 2012 (Doomed!)


3 posted on 12/18/2007 5:42:20 AM PST by xcamel (FDT/2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
For more than a year, the sun has been experiencing a lull in activity, marking the end of Solar Cycle 23, which peaked with many furious storms in 2000--2003. "Solar minimum is upon us," he says.

Could someone explain this count? What year did Solar Cycle 1 take place?

4 posted on 12/18/2007 5:43:33 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Meteor, comet or 12th Imam?............


5 posted on 12/18/2007 5:43:55 AM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Just in time for global warming/cooling/climate change.


6 posted on 12/18/2007 5:44:39 AM PST by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
What year did Solar Cycle 1 take place?

Ask Helen Thomas......

7 posted on 12/18/2007 5:45:15 AM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

http://survive2012.com/


8 posted on 12/18/2007 5:46:38 AM PST by Perdogg (Fred Thompson for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

What’s 2012?


9 posted on 12/18/2007 5:47:33 AM PST by WakeUpAndVote (Ho, Ho, Ho!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
From: http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2006/10may_longrange.htm ...A word about solar cycles: Astronomers number each 11-year solar cycle, 1, 2, 3 and so on. For obscure historical reasons, Solar Cycle 1 is a nondescript cycle which peaked in 1760. The most recent cycle, Cycle 23, peaked in 2001 and is coming to an end now....
10 posted on 12/18/2007 5:48:22 AM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpAndVote
What’s 2012?

A pretty good album by Rush.......

11 posted on 12/18/2007 5:49:33 AM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I’m sure Albore and the UN “climate experts” will be able to fix this with a few trillion dollars from us tax turnips in the US of A.


12 posted on 12/18/2007 5:49:58 AM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The real question is how can George W. Bush and Big Oil and SUV drivers be blamed for this?


13 posted on 12/18/2007 5:50:40 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpAndVote

It depends who answers.

http://survive2012.com/why_2012_maya.php


14 posted on 12/18/2007 5:50:44 AM PST by Perdogg (Fred Thompson for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
[Could someone explain this count? What year did Solar Cycle 1 take place?]

I am not sure when they date the model. But considering the average length of a cycle is 11 years, one can guess the beginning observations go back 250 years or more.

But, in 1957-60 the sunspot numbers were the highest ever recorded. As a result, radio communications were very good at higher frequencies (14-70 MHz).

In addition, the midwest was experiencing extreme winter snows/cold weather. The winters of 70-72 were also extremely bitter. Could it be that by 20012 we will be in the middle of a perceived Global Freezing scare?

Wouldn’t surprise me at all.

15 posted on 12/18/2007 5:51:52 AM PST by dbacks (Taglines for sale or rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Good. I haven’t seen a good aurora for a long time.


16 posted on 12/18/2007 5:52:20 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpAndVote

Oops, off a century.....but so am I......

17 posted on 12/18/2007 5:53:02 AM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Thanks. So if the Solar Cycle peaked in 2001 and is ending doesn’t that mean global warming is also ending?
18 posted on 12/18/2007 5:53:32 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I was reading their shopping list at
Super Market Costco Wal-Mart Type Food Shopping List http://survive2012.com/
And it looks just like the shopping lists for Y2K


19 posted on 12/18/2007 5:53:41 AM PST by buffyt (Free Border Agents Ramos and Campean before Christmas PLEASE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Ping.


20 posted on 12/18/2007 5:53:49 AM PST by blam (Secure the border and enforce the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson