[ReignOfError]

It is very much about the Huckster, unless he can refute the evidence that he used his influence to get his son off the hook.

Evidence will have to be presented before it can be refuted. All the article cites is an uncorroborated statement from a guy Huck fired.

[af_vet_rr]

Evidence will have to be presented before it can be refuted. All the article cites is an uncorroborated statement from a guy Huck fired.

The original newspaper article from 1998 is floating around on various email lists. Huckabee's son was named and was confirmed as being fired over the matter (he murdered the dog in front of other youth at the camp). The other person that helped him was named, and his father (of the other person) confirmed the incident. The Arkansas Gazette will probably republish it as a front-page item in the next day or two.

The fact that there is a public record of Huckabee's son being fired over the matter is pretty damning if you ask me, and given that there were witnesses, they will probably be tracked down and you'll see them on the networks in the next week.

[ellery]

There’s no record at all that David Huckabee suffered any legal consequences, despite the fact that the act of torturing and killing dogs rightfully has some heavy penalties attached.