To: MEGoody
this particular piece is about his son, not about Huck It is very much about the Huckster, unless he can refute the evidence that he used his influence to get his son off the hook.
42 posted on
12/17/2007 2:35:42 PM PST by
steve-b
(Sin lies only in hurting others unnecessarily. All other "sins" are invented nonsense. --RAH)
To: steve-b
It is very much about the Huckster, unless he can refute the evidence that he used his influence to get his son off the hook.Evidence will have to be presented before it can be refuted. All the article cites is an uncorroborated statement from a guy Huck fired.
To: steve-b
It is very much about the Huckster, unless he can refute the evidence that he used his influence to get his son off the hook.Actually, the article indicates no charges were ever filed, and yet the claim is that Huck pressured the director and even fired him. Over what? Something's weird here.
116 posted on
12/18/2007 6:14:25 AM PST by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson