I agree with Rush! The NYT has excused, shielded, and lied for the benefits of the Clintons, and placated their readers with deceipt, lies, obstruction, leaks, etc. in order to support the “myth” that the Clintons are the be all-end all in the world.
Maybe somebody at the NYT sees the writing on the wall - after all of Bill’s and Hill’s missteps in the last few weeks. Maybe they are figuring out Hillary is more of a liability than she is an inevitability.
Lots of people trace the decline of the MSM to the internet and talk-radio. I think it can more directly be traced to their shilling for the Clintons. There was effectively no internet when Vince Foster was murdered, and Rush was already talking to at least 15 million a week. For some such as myself it was transparently obvious that Foster was murdered, but the MSM said otherwise and I knew I had to look elsewhere for news. I still look at the MSM from time to time for sports scores. They always seem to get these right for some reason, but the only time I look at the front page of a major newspaper anymore is to laugh at it.
Maybe someone in charge of the bottom line has noticed.
ML/NJ