1 posted on
12/12/2007 4:03:28 AM PST by
Man50D
To: Man50D
2 posted on
12/12/2007 4:09:14 AM PST by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: Man50D
As a Male Lesbian, I applaud this action! ;-)
3 posted on
12/12/2007 4:09:57 AM PST by
SubMareener
(Become a monthly donor! Free FreeRepublic.com from Quarterly FReepathons!)
To: Man50D
Who benefits from such ridiculous legislation? Is there really a large constituency demanding to use the toilets in the “other guy’s” bathroom? Or is this just top-down marxism aimed at destroying the status quo?
4 posted on
12/12/2007 4:11:03 AM PST by
IronJack
(=)
To: Man50D
Excuse me, where's the bathroom?
5 posted on
12/12/2007 4:11:08 AM PST by
petercooper
("Daisy-cutters trump a wiretap anytime." - Nicole Gelinas - 02-10-04)
To: Man50D
How’d you like to end up in the shower stall next to Helen Thomas?
To: Man50D
Little known fact:
San FranSicko has nothing on Montgomery County MD. i.e. Berkely East.
To: Man50D
Soap-on-a-rope futures dropped sharply on the news.
13 posted on
12/12/2007 4:35:00 AM PST by
P.O.E.
To: Man50D
Montgomery County is completely insane.
14 posted on
12/12/2007 4:39:11 AM PST by
Fairview
(Taxes? I paid those -last- year!)
To: Freee-dame
16 posted on
12/12/2007 5:26:37 AM PST by
Travis McGee
(---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
To: Man50D
It's pretty obvious that the Montgomery county council members (and the County Manager) are the ones who want to climb into those showers with the little girls.
Signing petitions isn't quite the way to deal with these perverts ~ maybe there are some criminal statutes someone should trot out.
17 posted on
12/12/2007 5:35:08 AM PST by
muawiyah
To: Man50D
Sounds to me like the boys in the high school junior class are making the rules in Montgomery County...!!Heh Heh!!
20 posted on
12/12/2007 5:38:05 AM PST by
mo
To: Man50D
No authentic men left in Montgomery. Sad.
22 posted on
12/12/2007 5:44:58 AM PST by
polymuser
(In the twinkling of an eye...)
To: Man50D
This means that normal people who are accused of looking “wrong” at a preferred victim group member, will be arrested and convicted of a “hate crime”.
To: Man50D
God only made two genders, and the choice isn’t optional. If you have created a problem for yourself in not being able to use a public restroom, then that was optional.
Conform to the two gender limit, or hold it.
26 posted on
12/12/2007 5:59:00 AM PST by
SampleMan
(We are a free and industrious people. Socialist nannies do not become us.)
To: Man50D
When I was in law school a fellow graduate student (medical school) used to tell the story that when she was a swimmer on the women’s swim team of a well known university, she asked for, and received, permission to use the men’s locker room and shower. She said that if she had to be ogled when changing or showering, she would rather that it was men, not women doing it. She also said that the men were largely very gracious about her presence in their locker room.
30 posted on
12/12/2007 1:03:49 PM PST by
Pilsner
To: Man50D
No fear - - the geniuses who continue to live in this county will re-elect the same godless Democrats.
(yawn)
To: Man50D
I’m not up on all the nuances of the Constitution. Is it possible for us to kick Maryland out of the Union for embarassing the hell out of the rest of us?
35 posted on
12/12/2007 1:41:10 PM PST by
Walrus
(Those who work should eat better than those who do not)
To: Man50D
The organization said Leggett's signature on Bill 23-07 means even religious schools could be forced to hire transgender teachers "and then also allow cross-dressing but biological males in your daughters' school locker room." Why do people wait until "after the fact" to become Peeved over this crap.
Private school means PRIVATE! Keep the queer child molesters out.
36 posted on
12/12/2007 1:43:39 PM PST by
MaxMax
(God Bless America)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson